TY - JOUR AU - Di Iulio, Erminia PY - 2021/12/17 Y2 - 2024/03/28 TI - What is Gorgias’ ‘not being’? A brief journey through the Treatise, the Apology of Palamedes and the Encomium of Helen JF - Revista Archai JA - Rev. Archai VL - IS - 31 SE - Dossier Archai: Peri tou (me) ontos DO - 10.14195/1984-249X_31_26 UR - https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/41460 SP - AB - <div><span lang="EN-US">Assuming that a nihilist reading of Gorgias’ thought is to be ruled out, the issue of ‘not being’ remains one of the thorniest in his philosophy; indeed, it is fair to conclude that Gorgias is deeply concerned with ‘not being’. But what, after all, is Gorgias’ ‘not being’? This paper aims to answer this crucial question, by taking into consideration Gorgias’ main texts (i.e. the <em>Treatise</em>, the <em>Apology of Palamedes</em> and the <em>Encomium of Helen</em>). Each of them provides a serious – although not always explicit – account of ‘not being’. Overall, the aim is to show that Gorgias’ account of ‘not being’ is not concerned with ‘non-existence’ at all. It is deeply concerned, however, with falsehood and language. The paper will, therefore, be structured as follows: in part 1, the <em>Treatise</em> and specifically the the first section of the <em>Particular Proof</em> will be addressed and its ‘linguistic’ conception of ‘not-being’ fully exploited; in part 2, the <em>Apology of</em> <em>Palamedes</em> will be taken into account, in order to enucleate its ‘not-being-as-falsehood’ argument; the results from part 1 and part 2 will allow us, in part 3, to provide an analysis of the <em>Encomium of</em> <em>Helen</em> which points at its underlying conception of ‘not-being’.</span></div> ER -