A segunda navegação de Sócrates e dialética

Authors

  • Sylvain Delcomminette Université Libre de Bruxelles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_16_10

Keywords:

Dialética, Hipótese, Metodologia, Divisão, Definição, Dialectic, Hypothesis, Methodology, Division, Definition

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, I examine the famous passage of the Phaedo where Socrates explains the methodology of his ‘second sailing’ (99d-102a) and I try to relate this methodology to dialectic as it is presented in other dialogues. I suggest that the method Socrates describes has two steps. The first step, which is the only one practised in the Phaedo, consists not merely in positing hypotheses, but in positing the safest possible hypothesis, i.e. the hypothesis of Forms, and in building explanations consistent with it. The second step, which is only announced in the Phaedo without being put to use, corresponds to what Plato calls ‘dialectic’ in the Republic, which itself corresponds to the method of collection and division practised in later dialogues, and has the aim, not to prove the hypotheses posited in the first step, but to clarify or define them. Thus understood, this passage makes it possible to see a profound unity in Plato’s methodology.

Keywords: Dialectic, Hypothesis, Methodology, Division, Definition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-26

How to Cite

Delcomminette, S. (2015). A segunda navegação de Sócrates e dialética. Revista Archai, (16), 183. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_16_10

Issue

No. 16 (2016): Revista Archai nº16 (janeiro, 2016)

Section

Dossier

License

Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.

1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.