ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΗΣΙΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ and derivatives, in Plato's Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_36_04Keywords:
ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΗΣΙΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, Plato, ΧωρισμόςAbstract
he article shows that several studies on the meaning of νοῦς, νόησις, νοεῖν, and derivatives in pre-Platonic literature, especially in Homer, but also in some pre-Socratic thinkers, have concluded that these terms are never used in strictly abstract situations, but, on the contrary, always appear linked to emotions connected to concrete events. Plato is certainly the main “author” to be studied when it comes to the use of this terminology in cognitive functions. Indeed, he was the first to systematize a specialized vocabulary for these functions, and emphatically use these terms in passages of the Middle dialogues, when, according to Aristotle’s account of his Philosophy, in Metaphysics A 6, unlike Socrates, he began to suppose that the essence (οὐσία) of things is not in the things themselves, but lies beyond them, thus creating a separation (χωρισμός) which will be the fundamental source of all the difficulties concerning the “Theory of Ideas”. After hypothesizing the existence of the Ideas, abstract entities he considered more real than material ones, he created a special type of apprehension capable of capturing invisible, intelligible entities, νόησις, thus introducing a new dimension of reality: a previously non-existent, invisible, and radically abstract one. Based on these assumptions, the article ends by raising a series of questions to be addressed in a future approach to the same subject.
Downloads
References
ADAM, J. (ed.) (1965). PLATO. The Republic of Plato (notes, commentaries, and appendices). 2 vols. Repr. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (1ed. 1902).
AUSTIN, N. (1972). Magic in the Odyssey. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 5, p. 1-19.
BARNES, J. (1984). Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle Princeton, Princeton University Press.
BOEHME, J. (1929). Die Seele und das Ich im homerischen Epos Berlin, Teubner.
CHANTRAINE, P . (1984). Dictionnaire Étymologique de la Langue Grecque. Histoire des Mots Paris, Klincksieck.
CHERNISS, H. (1962). The Riddle of the Early Academy New York, Russell & Russell.
CORNFORD, F. (1937). Plato. The Timaeus of Plato (Translation with a running commentary). London, Kegan Paul.
DIELS, H.; KRANZ, W. (1903). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 1: A. DK 1-10, B. DK 11-58. Berlin, Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
DIELS, H.; KRANZ, W. (1922). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 3: Wirtindex, Namen- und Stellenregister. Berlin, Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung .
DIELS, H.; KRANZ, W. (1922). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker . 2: B. DK 59-78, C. DK 79-90. Berlin, Weidmannsche Verlagsbuchhandlung .
DINUCCI, A. (ed.) (2021). Górgias. Tratado do Não Ser. In DINUCCI, A. (ed.). Górgias: Epitáfio e Tratado do Não-Ser (Apresentação, Tradução e notas). Editorial Prometeus.
DOODLEY, W. (1989). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle's Metaphysics 1. New York, Cornell University Press.
FARTZOFF, M. (2016). Nous et noein en action dans les tragédies conservées : l’intelligence sur la scène tragique ”, Methodos 16, Available at http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4592 Accessed on 16/11/2025. DOI: 10.4000/methodos.4592
» https://doi.org/10.4000/methodos.4592» http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4592
FOUCAULT, M. (1966). Les Mots et les Choses : une archéologie des Sciences Humaines Paris, Éditions Gallimard.
FOUCAULT, M. (2005). The Order of Things: An archaeology of the human sciences Routledge Classics. London; New York, Routledge. (1ed. 1989).
FRAME, D. (1978). The Myth of Return in Early Greek Epic New Haven & London, Yale University Press.
FRANCO, I. F.; MATOSO, R. (2014). Os Argumentos formais dos Platonistas em favor da existência das ideias no ΠΕΡΙ ΙΔΕΩΝ e na Metafísica A9 de Aristóteles. Anais de Filosofia Clássica 8, n. 15, p. 24-47.
FRANCO, I. F.; MATOSO, R. (2018). Aristóteles. Sobre as Ideias (ΠΕΡΙ ΙΔΕΩΝ). Excertos de Alexandre de Aphrodisias, em Aristotelis metaphysica comentaria (tradução e comentários). O que nos faz pensar 26, n. 42, p.139-151.
FRANCO, I. F.; TORRANO, J. A. A. (2021). PLATÃO. O Banquete (tradução, apresentação e notas). 7. ed. Rio de Janeiro; São Paulo, Ed. Puc-Rio; Loyola.
FREEMAN, K. (1962). Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers (Translation of the Fragments in Diels Fragmente der Vorsokratiker). Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
FRITZ, K. (1943). NOOS and NOEIN in the Homeric Poems. Classical Philology 28, n. 2, p. 92-93.
FRITZ, K. (1945). ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras). Part I. From the Beginnings to Parmenides. Classical Philology , 40, n. 4, 184-202. DOI: 10.1086/362903
» https://doi.org/10.1086/362903
FRITZ, K. (1974). ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ and their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras). Part II. In: MOURELATOS, A. P. D. (ed.) The pre-Socratics: a collection of critical essays Princeton, Princeton University Press , p. 23-85.
GADAMER, H. (2006) Au commencement de la philosophie. Pour une lecture des Présocratiques (Traduit par Pierre Fruchon), Paris, Seuil.
GERSON, L. (2023). Intuition in Plato and the Platonic tradition. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31, n. 4, p. 579-596.
GRAHAM, D. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HAMILTON, E.; CAIRNS, H. (1989). The Collected Dialogues, including the Letters Princeton, Princeton University Press .
HAYDUCK, M. (ed.) (1891). Alexander of Aphrodisias. Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria Berlin, Georg Reimer.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1971). Nietzsche (Traduit de l'Allemand par Pierre Klossowski). Paris, Gallimard.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1973). Qu’appelle-t-on penser? (Traduit par Becker, A ; Granel, G.) Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1980). Qui est le Zarathoustra de Nietzsche ? In: Essais et conférences (Trad. Préau, A.). Paris, Gallimard .
KIRK, G. S. (ed.) (1994). Homer. The Iliad: A Commentary Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .
KIRK, S., RAVEN, J.; SCHOFIELD, M (1984). The Presocratic Philosophers, a Critical History with a Selection of Texts 2ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .
LEE, D. (1974). PLATO. The Republic (translation with an introduction). 2nd. ed. London, Penguin Books.
LLOYD, A. (1970). Non-Discursive Thought: An Enigma of Greek Philosophy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70, p. 261-274.
MANSION, S. (1969). L'objet des mathématiques et l”objet de la dialectique selon Platon. Révue Philosophique de Louvain 95, p. 365-388.
MAZON, P. (2021). Homère. Iliade (Traduction, introduction et notes). Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
NIETZSCHE, F. (1909). Beyond Good and Evil (Translated by Helen Zimmern). Edinburgh; London, T. N. Foulis.
O’BRIEN, D. (1987). Parmenides. Le Poème de Parménide Tome 2: Problèmes d’Interprétation (Texte, traduction, essais critique). Études sur Parménide Paris, Vrin.
PIERCE, D. (2005). On Local Disturbances: Reflections on Joyce’s Use of Language in Sirens. ABEI Journal: The Brazilian Journal of Irish Studies 7, 163-184;
RENEHAN, R. (1979). The Meaning of soma in Homer. A Study of Methodology. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 12, p. 269-282.
RENEHAN, R. (1980). On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 21 n. 2. p. 105-138.
ROBIN, L. (ed.). PLATON. Œuvres Complètes (1938). (Tradução e notas). 2 vols. Paris, Les Belles Lettres .
ROSS, W. D. (1984). Aristotle. The Works of Aristotle (Translation). Oxford, Clarendon Press.
ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1981). Aristotle. ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΤΑ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΦΥΣΙΚΑ (Introduction and commentary). Oxford, Clarendon Press .
SNELL, B. (1946), La découverte de l’esprit. La Genèse de la pensée européenne chez les Grecs Combas, Éditions de l’Éclat.
STELLA, F. (2007). La scrittura greca e la nascita del pensiero astratto. In: Coccoli, G.; Ludovico, A.; Marrone, C., Stella, F. (eds). Il corpo, la mente e i loro enigmi. Atti del I Convegno internazionale di filosofia “Mente, corpo, realità” Roma, Stamen, p. 247-265.
STELLA, F. (2016). L'origine des termes νόος-νοεῖν. L'intelligence comme « schéma d’action ». In Methodos. Savoirs et Textes 16. Available at https://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4592 Accessed on 16/11/2025. DOI: 10.4000/methodos.4592
» https://doi.org/10.4000/methodos.4592» https://journals.openedition.org/methodos/4592
TAYLOR, A. (1962). A Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus Oxford, Clarendon Press.
YEBRA, V. G. (1980). Aristotle. ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΤΑ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΦΥΣΙΚΑ . Madrid, Editorial Gredos.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irley Fernandes Franco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
