The plague of Christianity: religious dispute and pandemic in a fragment of Against the Christians, by Porphyry of Tyre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_29Keywords:
Porphyry of Tyre, Plague of Cyprian, Crisis of the Third Century, ideologyAbstract
This work discusses the religious clash between Christians and Pagans in the 3rd century CE based on a fragment of Against the Christians, by Porphyry of Tyre, cited by Eusebius of Caesarea. The focus is on blaming Christians for the Crisis of the third century, specifically in relation to the Plague of Cyprian, a pandemic that devastated several regions of the Empire and strengthened hostility against adherents of the Christian faith. The notion of ideology is used as a category of analysis, considering the inseparable nexus between material and spiritual aspects of social life.
Downloads
References
ADDEY, C. (2022). Dreams, Medicine and Healing in Late Antiquity: Oneiromancy (Dream Divination) in Porphyry’s Philosophy From Oracles. In: COUTINHO, L.; FERNANDES, E. (org.). Cura e encantamento: rito, mito e psicologia Brasília-DF, Tanto Mar, p. 113-148.
BARACAT JÚNIOR, J. C. (2006). Porfírio. Sobre a vida de Plotino e a organização de seus livros In: BARACAT JÚNIOR, J. C. Plotino, Enéadas I, II e III; Porfírio, Vida de Plotino, introdução, tradução e notas Tese. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas.
BECERRA, J. D. (2011). Porfirio. ΠΡΟΣ ΜΑΡΚΕΛΛΑΝ México, UNAM.
CHEVITARESE, A. L. (2006). Cristianismo e Império Romano. In: SILVA, G. V. da; MENDES, N. M. Repensando o Império Romano: perspectiva socioeconômica, política e cultural Rio de Janeiro, EDUFES, p. 161-174.
CLARK, G. (2007). Augustine’s Porphyry and the Universal Way of Salvation. In: KARAMANOLIS, G.; SHEPPARD, A. Studies on Porphyry London, University of London, p. 127-140.
COOK, J. G. (2002). The Interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism Peabody, Hendrickson Publishers.
COOK, J. G. (2004). The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck.
CORNELLI, G. (2006). Jesus “Homem Divino”: para uma história comparada do termo no mundo antigo”. In: CHEVITARESE, A. L.; CORNELLI, G.; SELVATICI, M. (org.). Jesus de Nazaré: uma outra história São Paulo, Annablume/Fapesp, p. 61-82.
DEFERRARI, R. J. (2007). Cyprian. Treatises Washington, The Catholic University of America Press.
DINDORF, L. (ed.) (1867). Eusebii Caesariensis. Praeparatio Evangelica Volumes 1-2. Leipzig, Teubner.
GEOFFROY, A. S.; DIAZ, J. P. (2020). From the Antonine Plague to the Cyprian Plague: Scopes and consequences of global plagues in the Roman Empire in the 3rd century AD. Revista chilena de infectología 37, n. 4, p. 450-455.
HARPER, K. (2016). Another Eye‑witness to the Plague described by Cyprian and notes on the “Persecution of Decius”. Journal of Roman Archaeology 29, p. 473‑476.
HARPER, K. (2015). Pandemics and passages to late antiquity: rethinking the plague of c.249-270 described by Cyprian. Journal of Roman Archaeology 28, p. 223-260.
HARPER, K. (2017). The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire Princeton, Princeton University Press.
HARTEL, W. von (ed.) (1868). Cyprian. S. Thasci Caecili Cypriani Opera Omnia. Corpus Scriptorum Eccl. Latinorum. Volume 3.1. Ed. Vienna, Gerold.
HENDERSON, J. (ed.) (1977). Tertullian. Apology; De spectaculis Trad. T.R. Glover. Minucius Felix. Octavius Trad. G. H. Rendall. The Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
ISLAS, J. D. B. (2011). Introducción general. In: ISLAS, J. D. B. Porfirio. ΠΡΟΣ ΜΑΡΚΕΛΛΑΝ . México: UNAM, p. 17-103.
JOHNSON, A. P. (2013). Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
KLOSTERMANN, E. (1976). Origenes. Matthäuserklärung Vol. II. Origenes Werke XI. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.
LUKÁCS, G. (2013). Para uma ontologia do ser social Vol. 2. Trad. N. Schneider , I. Tonet e R. V. Fortes . São Paulo, Boitempo.
MARELLI, U. (1984). L'epigrafe di Decio a Cosa e l'epiteto di «restitutor sacrorum». Aevum 58, f. 1, p. 52-56.
MARX, K.; ENGELS, F. (2007). A ideologia alemã Trad. R. Enderle , N. Schneider e L. C. Martorano . São Paulo, Boitempo .
MORLET, S. (2011). Eusebius polemic against Porphyry: a reassessment. In: INOWLOCKI, S.; ZAMAGNI, C. (ed.). Reconsidering Eusebius: collected papers on literary, historical, and theological issues Leiden; Boston, Brill, p. 119-150.
MUSCOLINO, G. (ed.). (2009). Porfirio. Contro i cristiani: nella raccolta di A. von Harnack con tutti i nuovi frammenti in appendice. Presentazione di G. Girgenti. Milano, Bompiani.
OEHLER, F. (ed.) (1846). Arnobius. Adversus nationes Lib. VII. Lipsiae: Typis et sumptibus Bernh, Tauchnitz.
ORSAG, M.; MCKINNEY; A. E.; REEDER, D. M. (2023). Interdisciplinary Insights from the Plague of Cyprian: Pathology, Epidemiology, Ecology and History. Cham/Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan.
SÁEZ, A. (2016) The Antonine plague: A global pestilence in the II century d.C. Revista chilena de infectología 33, n. 2, p. 218-221.
SCHOTT, J. M. (2008). Christianity, empire and the making of religion in late antiquity Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
SILVA, É. C. M. da; LIMA NETO, B. M. (2020). A Praga de Cipriano de Cartago (c. 249‑270 D.C.): uma resposta política e social à pandemia. PHOÎNIX 26, n. 2, p. 157-187.
SIMMONS, M. B. (1995). Arnobius of Sicca: Religious Conflict and Competition in the Age of Diocletian Oxford, Clarendon Press.
SODANO, A. R. (trad.) (2005). Porfirio. Astinenza dagli animali Prefazione, introduzione e apparati di G. Girgenti. Milão, Bompiani.
SODANO, A. R. (2006). Porfirio. Vangelo di un pagano Lettera a Marcela, Contro Boeto, Sull’anima, Sul “Conosci te stesso”. Seguito da Vita di Porfirio di Eunapio. Milano, Bompiani .
SORDI, M. (1983). I cristiani e l’Impero Romano Milano, Jaca Book.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sérgio Luiz Gusmão Gimenes Romero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
