Plotinus, Proclus and the Arabic Neoplatonism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_27Keywords:
Arabic neoplatonism, historiography, Plotinus, Proclus, al-KindiAbstract
In this article, I present a historiographical debate about the Arabic Neoplatonism from some assumptions since the 19th century. From the editions of the works and the posterior studies, the distinction between the Plotinian corpus in Arabic, the Plotiniana Arabica, and the Proclean corpus, the Procleana Arabica, was consolidated, given the way in which the relationship between the texts originally written in Arabic and their Greek sources was understood. However, in view of recent studies, different assumptions and methodologies have been adopted. Given the complexity of the discussion, in this text I will restrict myself to the analysis of two works originally written in Arabic, namely The Theology of Aristotle and the Discourse on the Pure Good, known as Liber de Causis. Starting from the critique of two traditionally accepted historiographical assumptions, the aim of the following analysis is to discuss how new approaches allow us a more unified understanding of the nature of the Arabic Neoplatonic corpus. A consequence of the distinction between the Plotiniana Arabica and the Procleana Arabica is to lock the texts into philosophical models that are different from these one found in the works themselves.
Downloads
References
ADAMSON, P. S. (2000). The Arabic Plotinus: A Study of the “Theology of Aristotle” and Related Texts Dissertation (PhD), University of Notre Dame.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2002). The Arabic Plotinus. A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle London, Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2007). The Kindian Tradition. The Structure of Philosophy in Arabic Neoplatonism. In: D’ANCONA, C. (ed.). The Libraries of the Neoplatonists Leiden, Brill, p. 351-370.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2015). Neoplatonism: The Last Ten Years. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9, n. 2, p. 205-220.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2021). The Theology of Aristotle. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall Edition). Disponível em https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/theology-aristotle/ Acessado em 20/09/2025.
» https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/theology-aristotle/
ADAMSON, P. S. (2024). Al-Kindi. In: VERZA, T. M.; SOUSA, M. C. (eds.). Estudos em história da filosofia árabe e islâmica Vol. I, Parte I. Belo Horizonte, Editora PPGFil, p. 13-50.
ADAMSON, P. S.; PORMANN, P. E. (2012). The Philosophical Works of Al-Kindi Oxford, Oxford University Press.
AL-BADAWĪ, ʿA. R. (ed.) (1955a). Al-Aflaṭūnīyah al-Muḥdathah ʿindā al-ʿArab Al-Qāhirah.
AL-BADAWĪ, ʿA. R. (ed.) (1955b). Plotinus apud Arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt Cairo, Dār al-Maʿārif.
ATTIE FILHO, M.; JUBRAN, S. A. C (trads.). (2006). A Filosofia Primeira - Alkindī. Edição do texto árabe, tradução e notas. Tiraz: Revista de Estudos Árabes e das Culturas do Oriente Médio, p. 129-159.
BELO, C. (trad.) (2010). A Teologia de Aristóteles Vol. XIII, tomo 2. Tradução do árabe, introdução e notas. Lisboa, Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional.
BOULNOIS, O. (2022). Deux modèles de causalité, deux théories de la liberté: À propos de deux interprétations de la proposition I du Livre des causes In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes Vol. 3. Leiden, Brill , p. 338-370.
CALMA, D. (ed.) (2019). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes . Vol. 1: Western Scholarly Networks and Debates. Leiden, Brill .
D’ANCONA, C. C. (1995). Recherches sur le Liber de Causis Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (2001). Theology of Aristotle. Chapter 1: Structure and Composition. Oriens 36, p. 78-112.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (2014). The Liber de Causis. In: GERSH, S. (ed.). Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to Renaissance Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 137-161.
DE LIBERA, A. (2004). A filosofia medieval Tradução de Nicolás Nyimi Campanário e Yvone Maria de Campos Teixeira da Silva. São Paulo, Edições Loyola (1ed. 1998).
DODDS, E. R. (trad.) (1963). Proclus. The Elements of Theology. A Revised Text with Translation, Introduction and Commentary Oxford, Oxford University Press . (1ed. 1933).
ENDRESS, G. (1973). Proclus Arabus: zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio theologica in arabischer Übersetzung Beirut, In Kommission bei Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden.
ENDRESS, G. (1997). The Circle of al-Kindi. Early Arabic Translations from the Greek and the Rise of Islamic Philosophy. In: ENDRESS, G.; KRUK, R. (eds.). The Ancient Tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the Transmission of Greek Philosophy and Sciences Dedicated to H. J. Drossaart Lulofs on his Ninetieth Birthday Leiden, p. 43-76.
FAGGIN, G. (2000). Plotino. Enneadi. Testo greco a fronte Milano, R.C.S. Libri S.p.A.
GUTAS, D. (1998). Greek thought, Arabic culture: The Graeco-Arabic translation movement in Baghdad and early ʿAbbāsid society (2nd-4th/8th-10th centuries) London; New York, Routledge.
GUTAS, D. (2002). The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: An Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 29, n. 1, p. 5-25.
HENRY, P.; SCHWYZER, H.-R. (eds.) (1959). Plotini Opera: Enneades IV-V. Plotiniana Arabica Traduzido por Geoffrey Lewis. Museum Lessianum, Series Philosophica, XXXIV. Paris, Desclée de Brouwer.
JOLIVET, J. (1979). Pour le dossier du Proclus arabe: Al-Kindi et la “Théologie platonicienne”. Studia Islamica 49, p. 55-75.
KRAUS, P. (1940). Plotin chez les Arabes. Remarques sur un nouveau fragment de la paraphrase arabe des Ennéades Bulletin de l’Institut d’Égypte 23, n. 2, p. 263-295.
ONNASCH, E.-O.; SCHOMAKERS, B. (2015). Proklos: Theologische Grundlegung (Philosophische Bibliothek, 562). Hamburg, Felix Meiner Verlag.
PEREIRA, R. H. de S. (org.) (2007). Busca do Conhecimento. Ensaios de Filosofia Medieval no Islã São Paulo, Paulus.
RIGGS, T. (2017). On the Absence of the Henads in the Liber de Causis: Some Consequences for Procline Subjectivity. In: BUTORAC, D. D.; LAYNE, D. A. (eds.). Proclus and his Legacy Berlin/Boston, Walter de Gruyter GmbH, p. 289-310.
ROSENTHAL, F. (1952). Ash-Shaykh al-Yunani and the Arabic Plotinus Source. Orientalia 21, n. 4, p. 461-493.
ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1953). Aristotle. Metaphysics Oxford, Oxford University Press . (1ed. 1924).
SOMMA, B. (2022). The Causal Efficacy of Nature in the Neoplatonica Arabica. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes . Vol. 3. Leiden, Brill , p. 281-302.
STEEL, C. (2022). Substantia stans per essentiam suam: Proclus et l’auteur du De causis sur les êtres qui se constituent eux-mêmes. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes . Vol. 3. Leiden, Brill , p. 37-59.
TAYLOR, R. C. (1978). A Note on Chapter I of the Liber de Causis Manuscripta 12, p. 169-172.
TAYLOR, R. C. (1981). The Liber de Causis (Kalām fī Maḥḍ al-Khair). A Study of Medieval Neoplatonism Dissertation (PhD), University of Toronto.
TAYLOR, R. C. (1992). A Critical Analysis of the Structure of the Kalām fī Maḥḍ al-Khair (Liber de Causis). In: MOREWEDGE, P. (ed.). Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought Albany, NY, State University of New York Press, p. 11-40.
TAYLOR, R. C. (2021). Contextualizing the Kalām fī Maḥḍ al-Khair/Liber de Causis In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes . Vol. 2. Leiden, Brill , p. 211-232.
TER REEGEN, J. G. J. (trad.) (2000). O Livro das Causas: Liber de Causis Porto Alegre, EDIPUCRS.
TER REEGEN, J. G. J. (2005). A Alma na Teologia do Pseudo-Aristóteles. Kairós - Revista Acadêmica da Prainha, n. 1, p. 48-73.
VERZA, T. M.; SOUSA, M. C. (2024a). Estudos em história da filosofia árabe e islâmica . Vol. I, Parte I. Belo Horizonte, Editora PPGFil .
VERZA, T. M.; SOUSA, M. C. (2024b). Estudos em história da filosofia árabe e islâmica . Vol. I, Parte II. Belo Horizonte, Editora PPGFil .
VLAD, M. (2022). L’Être Premier - Entre Proclus et Denys L’Aréopagite. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes . Vol. 3. Leiden, Brill .
ZIMMERMANN, F. W. (1986) The origins of the so-called Theology of Aristotle. In: KRAYE, J. et al. (eds.). Pseudo-Aristotle in the Middle Ages, The Warburg Institute, University of London, London, p. 110-240.
ZIMMERMANN, F. (1994). Proclus Arabus Rides Again. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 4, n. 1, p. 9-51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meline Costa Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
