Division and Animal Sacrifice in Plato’s Statesman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_34_S6Keywords:
Method, Definition, Dialectic, Plato, StatesmanAbstract
In the Statesman (287c3-5), Plato proposes that the philosophical divider should divide analogously to how the butcher divides a sacrificial animal. According to the common interpretation, the example of animal sacrifice illustrates that we should “cut off limbs” (kata mele), that is, divide non-dichotomously into functional parts of a living whole. We argue that this interpretation is historically inaccurate and philosophically problematic: it relies on an inaccurate understanding of sacrificial butchery and leads to textual puzzles. Against the common interpretation, we argue that the example of animal sacrifice illustrates that correct division minimizes (it cuts into the smallest number possible) by first dividing dichotomously and then dividing non-dichotomously into “parts,” not “limbs.” We will show that both the philosophical divider and sacrificial butcher proceed exactly in this way. By taking Plato’s comparison to the historical practice of animal sacrifice seriously, our interpretation provides better solutions to several textual puzzles than the common interpretation.
Downloads
References
BENARDETE, S. (1984). The Being of the Beautiful. Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman Chicago, Chicago University Press.
BREMMER, J. N. (2007). Greek Normative Animal Sacrifice. In: OGDEN, D. (ed.). A Companion to Greek Religion Oxford, Blackwell, p. 132-144.
CARBON, J.M. (2017). Meaty Perks: Epichoric and Topological Trends. In: HITCH, S.; RUTHERFORD, I. (eds.). Animal Sacrifice in the Ancient Greek World Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 151-177.
CARPENTER, A. (2021). Civic Function and the Taxonomy of Skills (287b4-290e9). In: DIMAS, P.; LANE, M.; SAUVÉ MEYER, S. (eds.). Plato's Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 136-155.
DANFORTH, A. (2023). Butchering Poultry, Rabbit, Lamb, Goat, and Pork: The Comprehensive Photographic Guide to Humane Slaughtering and Butchering North Adams, Storey Publishing.
DORTER, K. (1999). The Clash of Methodologies in Plato's Statesman In: VAN OPHUIJSEN, J.M. (ed.). Plato and Platonism Washington D.C., Catholic University of America Press, p. 198-217.
DURAND, J.-L.. (1989). Greek Animals: Toward a Topology of Edible Bodies. In: DETIENNE, M.; VERNANT, J. (eds.). The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks Chicago, University of Chicago Press, p. 87-118.
EKROTH, G. (2014). Animal Sacrifice in Antiquity. In: CAMPBELL, G. L. . (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought and Life Oxford, Oxford University Press , p. 324-354.
EKROTH, G. (2008). Man, meat and god. On the division of the animal victim at Greek sacrifices. In: MATTHAIOU, A.; POLINSKAYA, I. (eds.). Mikros hieromnemon: Meletes eis mnemen Michael H. Jameson Athens, Greek Epigraphic Society, p. 259-290.
GILL, M.L. (2012). Philosophos: Plato’s Missing Dialogue Oxford, Oxford University Press.
GRAMS, L. (2012). The Eleatic Visitor’s Method of Division. Apeiron 45, n. 2, p. 130-156.
HENRY, D. (2011). A Sharp Eye for Kinds: Plato on Collection and Division. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 41, p. 229-255.
HITCH, S. (2015). Sacrifice. In: WILKINS, J.; NADEAU, R. (eds.). A Companion to Food in the Ancient World Oxford, Blackwell , p. 337-347.
HOCHHOLZER, C. (2016). Teile und Teilhabe: Eine Untersuchung über Platons "Sophistes" Berlin, De Gruyter.
HUGHES, D. D.. (1991). Human Sacrifice in Ancient Greece London, Routledge.
MCPHERRAN, M. L.. (1996). The Religion of Socrates University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
MILLER, M. H.. (2004). The Philosopher in Plato’s Statesman 2nd Ed. Las Vegas, Parmenides Publishing.
MOORE, H. (2015). Animal Sacrifice in Plato’s Later Methodology. In: BELL, J.; NAAS, M. (eds.). Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 179-192.
MORTON, J. (2024). From the Butcher’s Knife to God’s Ears: The Leg and Tail in Greek Sacrifice. In: CARBON, J.; EKROTH, G. (eds.). From Snout to Tail: Exploring the Greek Sacrificial Animal from the Literary, Epigraphical, Iconographical, Archeological and Zooarcheological Evidence Svenska institutet i Athen, Stockholm, p. 21-32
NAIDEN, F. (2015). Sacrifice. In: EIDINOW, E.; KINDT, J. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion Oxford, Oxford University Press , p. 463-476.
RICKEN, F. 2008. Politikos Übersetzung und Kommentar. Platon Werke Band II.4 Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
ROWE, C. J. (1997). Statesman (translation). In: COOPER, J.M.; HUTCHINSON, D.S. (eds.). Plato: Complete Works Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company.
SAYRE, K. M. (2006). Metaphysics and Method in Plato's Statesman . Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .
SCODEL, H.R. (1987). Diaeresis and Myth in Plato’s Statesman . Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht .
STENZEL, J. (1931). Studien zur Entwicklung der platonischen Dialektik von Sokrates zu Aristoteles, Zweite, Erweiterte Auflage Leipzig, Teubner.
VLASITS, J. (2021). Division, Syllogistic, and Science in Prior Analytics I.31. Ergo 8, n. 10 p. 269-305.
VLASITS, J. 2023. The Puzzle of the Sophist. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105, n. 3, p. 359-387.
WHITE, D. A. 2007. Myth, Metaphysics and Dialectic in Plato's Statesman London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Freya Möbus, Justin Vlasits
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
