“My dear Phaedrus, where is it you are going, and where have you come from?”: An Interpretation of the Opening Line of the Phaedrus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_33_19Keywords:
Plato, Phaedrus, Unity of the Phaedrus, Psychagogy, PersuasionAbstract
I argue that the opening line of the Phaedrus proleptically encapsulates the major themes of the dialogue and that paying attention to the opening line enables us to strengthen the identification of psychagogy as the key unifying thread of the whole dialogue. In particular, I argue that the opening line foreshadows the quarrel between Lysias and Socrates over the practical guidance of Phaedrus’ soul; the prominence of friendship in the philosophical form of life; the pertinence of Socrates’ one-on-one, custom-built speeches, vis-à-vis the later conceptualization of rhetoric; the definition of the soul as a source of never-ending movement; as well as the origin (arché) and destiny (télos) of human souls, following the lines of the Palinode.
Downloads
References
ASMIS, E. (1986). Psychagogia in Plato’s Phaedrus. Illinois Classical Studies 11, n. 1, p. 153-72.
BALTZLY, D., and GARDINER, Q. (2020). Hermias on the Unity of the Phaedrus. In: FINAMORE, J. F.; MANOELA, C.-P.; WEAR, S. K. (eds.). Studies in Hermias’ Commentary on Plato’s Phaedrus Leiden/Boston, Brill, p. 68-83.
BALTZY, D. (2020). Journeys in Plato’s Phaedrus: Hermias’ Reading of the Walk to Ilissus. In: FINAMORE, J. F.; MANOELA, C.-P.; WEAR, S. K. (eds.). Studies in Hermias’ Commentary on Plato’s Phaedrus Leiden/Boston, Brill , p. 7-24.
BETT, R. (1986). Immortality and the Nature of the Soul in the Phaedrus. Philosophy & Rhetoric 31, n. 1, p. 38-50.
BREITENBERGER, B. M. (2007). Aphrodite and Eros: The Development of Erotic Mythology in Early Greek Poetry and Cult New York, Routledge.
BRISSON, L. (1989). Platon. Phèdre; suivi de “La pharmacie de Platon”, de Jacques Derrida Paris, Flammarion.
BURNYEAT, M. F. (1998). First Words: A Valedictory Lecture. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43, p. 1-20.
CAPUCCINO, C. (2014). APXH ɅOΓOY (ARCHE LOGOU). Sui Proemi Platonici e Il Loro Significato Filosofico Firenze, Casa Editrice Leo S. Olschki s.r.l.
CLAY, D. (1979). Socrates’ Prayer to Pan. In: BOWERSOCK, G. W.; BURKERT, W.; PUTNAM, M. C. (eds.). Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday Berlin/Boston, De Guyter, p. 345-53.
COBB, W. S. (1993). Plato. The Symposium and the Phaedrus: Plato’s Erotic Dialogues Albany, State University of New York Press.
COVENTRY, L. (1990). The Role of the Interlocutor in Plato’s Dialogues: Theory and Practice. In: PELLING, C. (ed.). Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, p. 174-96.
DICKEY, E. (1996). Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press .
FERRARI, G. R. F. (1987). Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
GRISWOLD, C. L. (1996). Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
HACKFORTH, R. (1952). Plato. Phaedrus Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .
HAVELOCK, E. A. (1986). The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present New Haven, Yale University Press.
HEATH, M. (1989). The Unity of Plato’s Phaedrus Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 7, p. 151-73.
BALTZLY, D.; SHARE, M. J. (eds.). (2018). Hermias. On Plato Phaedrus 227a-245e London/New York, Bloomsbury Academic.
JELINEK, E., and PAPPAS, N. (2020). Hippocrates at Phaedrus 270c. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101, n. 3, p. 409-30.
KAHN, C. H. (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.
KASTELY, J. L. (2002). Respecting the Rupture: Not Solving the Problem of Unity in Plato’s Phaedrus Philosophy & Rhetoric 35, n. 2, p. 138-52.
KELESSIDOU, A. (1992). La Psychagogie Du Phèdre et Le Long Labeur Philosophique. In: ROSSETTI, L. (ed.). Understanding the Phaedrus: Proceedings of the II Symposium Platonicum Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag, p. 265-68.
KIERKEGAARD, S. (2000). The Point of View of My Work as an Author: A Direct Communication, Report to History. In: HONG, H. V.; HONG, E. H. (eds.). The Essential Kierkegaard Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 455-81.
LEBECK, A. (1972). The Central Myth of Plato’s Phaedrus. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 13, n.2, p. 267-290.
MILLER, M. H. (1985). Platonic Provocations: Reflections on the Soul and the Good in the Republic In: O’MEARA, D. J. (ed.). Platonic Investigations Washington, Catholic University of America Press, p. 163-93.
MOORE, C. (2014). Arguing for the Immortality of the Soul in the Palinode of the Phaedrus. Philosophy & Rhetoric 47, n. 2, p. 179.
MORROW, G. R. (1993). Plato’s Cretan City: A Historical Interpretation of the Laws Princeton, Princeton University Press .
MOSS, J. (2012). Soul‐Leading: The Unity of The Phaedrus, Again. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, p. 1-23.
NEHAMAS, A.; WOODRUFF, P. (1995). Plato. Phaedrus Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett.
NICHOLSON, G. (1999). Plato’s Phaedrus: The Philosophy of Love West Lafayette, Purdue University Press.
O’NEILL, W. (1971). Plato. Alcibiades I: A Translation and Commentary Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands.
PEIXOTO, M. C. D. (2011). La psicagogia del Fedro. In: CASERTANO, G. (ed.). Il Fedro di Platone: struttura e problematiche Napoli, Loffredo, p. 173-206.
PENTASSUGLIO, F. (2020). Philosophical Synousia and Pedagogical Eros: On Socrates’ Reshaping of Paideia. Philosophie Antique 20, p. 75-105.
PLASS, P. (1968). The Unity of the Phaedrus Symbolae Osloenses 43, n. 1, p. 7-38.
ROBB, K. (1994). Literacy and Paideia in Ancient Greece Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press .
ROWE, C. (1986). Plato. Phaedrus Warminster, Aris & Phillips.
RYAN, P. (2012). Plato. Phaedrus: A Commentary for Greek Readers Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.
SCULLY, S. (2003). Plato. Phaedrus Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett.
SHEFFIELD, F. C. C. (2011). Beyond Eros: Friendship in The Phaedrus. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111, p. 251-73.
STAFFORD, E. (2000). Worshipping Virtues: Personification and the Divine in Ancient Greece London/Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.
STAVRU, A. (2017). La Nuova Paideia Di Socrate. In: MANGANARO, P.; VIMERCATI, E. (eds.). Formare e Tras-Formare l’uomo: Per Una Storia Della Filosofia Come Paideia Pisa, Edizioni ETS, p. 31-49.
TRABATTONI, F. (2005). La Verità Nascosta: Oralità e Scrittura in Platone e Nella Grecia Classica Roma, Carocci.
WERNER, D. S. (2007). Plato’s Phaedrus and the Problem of Unity. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, p. 91-139.
WERNER, D. (2012). Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press .
WHITE, D. A. (1993). Rhetoric and Reality in Plato’s Phaedrus. Albany, State University of New York Press .
YUNIS, H. (2011). Plato. Phaedrus Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press .
ZINGANO, M. A. de A. (2011). Intorno all’anima: megalôn gar heneka periiteon (274a3). In: CASERTANO, G. (ed.). Il Fedro di Platone: struttura e problematiche Napoli, Loffredo , p. 375-93.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Pedro Mauricio Garcia Dotto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
