Aristotle on dialectic and definition in scientific inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_32_16Keywords:
Dialectic, refutation, definition, scientific inquiry, principles, proofsAbstract
By framing Aristotle’s dialectic in the broader context of scientific inquiry and demonstration, this paper is aimed at showing of what use the “reputable opinions” can be for grasping the principles of sciences, as declared in Topics I.2. It argues that such a use cannot imply ‒ at any stage of inquiry ‒ a replacement of the logic and intrinsic goals of demonstration by those proper to dialectic. However, it also defends a substantive (but still modest) contribution of dialectic ‒ beyond its well-attested methodological role in discarding contradictory opinions and its (possible though not germane to the context of Topics I.2) application to proving the principle of non-contradiction by means of refutation. This contribution consists in providing the preliminary accounts of facts in order to have scientific inquiry started, as required in Posterior Analytics II.8. To better appreciate how the proposed location of dialectic in a pre-demonstrative stage of inquiry is operational, the paper finally examines Physics IV.1-5.
Downloads
References
BARNES, J. (1969). Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration. Phronesis 14, p. 123-154.
BARNES, J. (1980). Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34, p. 490-511.
BARNES, J. (1981). Proof and the Syllogism. In: BERTI, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science. The Posterior Analytics. Padua, Antenore, p. 17-59.
BARNES, J. (21993). Aristotle, Posterior Analytics. Translated with a Commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BARNES, J. (ed.) (1995). The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 volumes. Princeton, Bollingen Series.
BERTI, E. (1991). Les méthodes d’argumentation et de demonstration dans la ‘Physique’. (Apories, Phénomènes, Principes). In: DE GANDTI, F.; SOUFRIN, P. (eds.), La Physique d’ Aristote et les conditions d’une science de la nature. Paris, Vrin, p. 53-72.
BERTI, E. (1995). L’uso ‘scientifico’ della dialettica in Aristotele. In Nuovi Studi Aristotelici I. Brescia, 2004, Morcelliana, p. 265-282.
BERTI, E. (2001-2). Il valore epistemologico degli ἔνδοξα secondo Aristotele. In: BERTI, E., Nuovi Studi Aristotelici I. Brescia, 2004, Morcelliana, p. 317-332.
BOLTON, R. (1987). Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals. In: GOTTHELF, A. and LENNOX, J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 120-66.
BOLTON, R. (1991). Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science. In: JUDSON, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Collection of Essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 1-29.
BOLTON, R. (1999). The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic. In: SIM, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. Lanham Lexington Books, p. 57-105.
BOLTON, R. (2009). Two Standards for Inquiry in Aristotle’s De Caelo. In: BOWEN, A.; WILDBERG, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo. Leiden/Boston, Brill, p. 51-82.
BRONSTEIN, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. The Posterior Analytics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BRUNSCHWIG, J. (1967). Aristote, Topiques, Livres I-IV. Text établi et traduit. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
BRUNSCHWIG, J. (2000). Dialectique et Philosophie chez Aristote, à nouveau. In: CORDERO, N. L. (ed.), Ontologie et Dialogue. Mélanges en Hommage à Pierre Aubenque. Paris, Vrin, p. 108-133.
BRUNSCHWIG, J. (2007). Aristote, Topiques, Livres V-VIII. Text établi et traduit. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
CLEARY, J. (1995). Working Through Puzzles with Aristotle. In: SIM, M. (ed.), The Crossroads of Norm and Nature. Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics and Metaphysics. Lanham (Maryland), Rowman & Littelfield, p. 175-220.
DETEL, W. (1993). Aristoteles, Analytica Posteriora. Übersetzt und erläutert. 2 volumes. Berlin, Akademie.
FREDE, D. (2012). The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa are and what they are not. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 43, p. 185-215.
GOTTHELF, A. (1987). First principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. In: GOTTHELF, A.; LENNOX, J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 167-98.
HUSSEY, E. (1983). Aristotle, Physics. Books III and IV. Translated with Introduction and Notes, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
IRWIN, T. (1988). Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
LEAR, J. (1980). Aristotle and Logical Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LE BLOND, J. M. (21970). Logique et Méthode chez Aristote. Étude sur la recherche des principes dans la Physique Aristotélicienne. Paris, Vrin.
LENNOX, J. (1987). Divide and Explain: the Posterior Analytics in Practice. In: GOTTHELF, A.; LENNOX, J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 90-119.
LENNOX, J. (2011). Aristotle on Norms of Inquiry. Hopos 1/1, p. 23-46.
MANSION, A. (21987). Introduction à la Physique Aristotélicienne. Louvain-La-Neuve, Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.
MARTINS MENDONÇA, F. (2014). A utilidade dos Tópicos em relaçao aos princípios das ciencias. In: ANGIONI, L. (ed.), Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles, Campinas, Phi, p. 287-329.
MORISON, B. (2002) On Location. Aristotle’s Concept of Place, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. (1986). Saving Aristotle’s appearances. In: NUSSBAUM, M. C., The Fragility of Goodness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 267-93.
OWEN, G. E. L. (21980). Τιθέναι τὰ φαινὸμενα. In: MANSION, S. (ed.), Aristote et les Problèmes de Méthode, Paris/Louvain-La Neuve, Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie, p. 83-103.
PRIMAVESI, O. (1996). Die Aristotelische Topik. Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B. München, Beck.
ROSS, W. D. (1949). Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. A revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
ROSS, W D. (1950). Aristotle’s Physics. A revised text with introduction and commentary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
ROSSI, G. (2017). Going through aporiai: the critical use of Aristotle’s dialectic. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 52, p. 209-56.
ROSSITTO, C. (2000). Studi sulla dialettica in Aristotele. Napoli, Bibliopolis.
SMITH, R. (1982). The Relationship of Aristotle’s Two Analytics. Classical Quarterly 32/2, p. 327-35.
SMITH, R. (1989). Aristotle, Prior Analytics. Translated, with introduction, notes, and commentary. Indianapolis, Hackett.
SMITH, R. (1993). Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic. Synthese 96, p. 335-58.
SMITH, R. (1994). Dialectic and the Syllogism. Ancient Philosophy 14, p. 133-51.
SMITH, R. (1997). Aristotle, Topics. Books I and VIII with excerpts from related texts. Translated with a Commentary, Oxford Clarendon Press.
SMITH, R. (1999). Dialectic and Method in Aristotle. In: SIM, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. Lanham (Maryland), Lexington Books, p. 39-55.
SOLMSEN, F. (1929). Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik, Berlin, Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
VIGO, A. (1995). Aristóteles, Física, Libros III-IV. Traducción, introducción y comentario. Buenos Aires, Biblos.
WALLIES, M. (1891). Alexander of Aphrodisias. In Aristotelis Topicorum Libri Octo Commentaria. (CAG II.2). Berlin, Reimer.
WEIL, E. (1975). The Place of Logic in Aristotle’s Thought. In: BARNES, J.; SCHOFIELD, M.; SORABJI, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. 1. Science. London, Duckworth, p. 88-111.
WIELAND, W. (31992). Die aristotelische Physik. Untersuchungen über die Grundlegung der Naturwissenschaft und die sprachlichen Bedingungen der Prinzipienforschung bei Aristoteles. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
ZILLIG, R. (ed.) (2017) Dossier: Ética Eudêmia. Revista Archai, n. 20. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_20_3
ZINGANO, M. (2007). Aristotle and the Problems of Method in Ethics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, p. 297-330.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fabián Mié
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
