Numenius interpreter of the Timaeus. Notes on the exegesis of the verb blépo (frr. 11, 12, 18 des Places)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_32_35Keywords:
Numenio, Platone, Timeo, DemiurgoAbstract
Numenius belongs to the contest of the Middle Platonic interpreters of Plato's dialogues. In Middle Platonism, in fact, spread a tendency to interpret Plato's philosophy in a systematic way. The most relevant dialogue for this exegetical operation in Middle Platonism was certainly the Timaeus. In this paper I intend to focus on Numenius' interpretation of pages 28a-29a of Timaeus and examine the exegesis in the light of his onto-theological perspective. In the Timaeus, the use of the verb blépo serves to describe the fact that the demiurge is contemplative of the intelligible paradigm. In Numenius, on the other hand, the association of the verb blépo with the demiurge is intended to show the role of mediator that the second god plays between the first principle and matter. In this way we will show how the passages of the Timaeus are interpreted by Numenius in the light of his dualist metaphysics.
Downloads
References
BALTES, M. (1975). Numenios von Apamea und der platonische Timaios Vigiliae Christianae 29, p. 241-270 (adesso in ΔΙΑΝΟΗΜΑΤΑ. Kleine Schriften zu Platon und zum Platonismus, Stuttgart 1999, p. 1-32).
BALTES, M. (1976), Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpretern, Band I. Leiden, Brill.
BONAZZI, M. (2017), Middle Platonists on the Eternity of Universe, in: ROSKAM, G.; VERHEYDEN, J. (eds.), Light on Creation. Ancient Commentators in Dialogue and Debate on the Origin of the World Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, p. 3-15.
CENTRONE, B. (2012). L’esegesi del Timeo nell’ Accademia antica, in: CELIA, F.; ULACCO, A. Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe e latine Pisa, Pisa University Press, p. 57-80.
CORNFORD, F.M. (1997). Plato’s Cosmology. The Timaeus of Plato Indianapolis-Cambridge, Hackett Publishing Company.
DES PLACES, E. (1973). Numénius. Fragments. Texte établi et traduit par Éduard des Places Paris, Les belles lettres.
DILLON, J. (2010). I medioplatonici, a cura di E. Vimercati. Milano, Vita & Pensiero.
DONINI, P. (1994). Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica. ANRW, Band II, 36.7. Berlin, De Gruyter, p. 5027-5100.
DÖRRIE, H.-BALTES, M. (1998). Der Platonismus in der Antike, Band V: Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) II, Bausteine 125-150: Text, Übersetzung, Kommentar. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog Verlag.
FERRARI, F. (2006). Poietes kai pater Interpretazioni medioplatoniche di Tim. 28c 3-5 in: DE GREGORIO, G.; MEDAGLIA, S.M. Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi. Miscellanea di studi Napoli, Bibliopolis, p. 43-58.
FERRARI, F. (2007). Separazione asimmetrica e causalità eidetica nel Timeo, in: NAPOLITANO VALDITARA, L.M. La sapienza di Timeo. Studi a margine del Timeo di Platone Milano, Vita & Pensiero , p. 141-172.
FERRARI, F. (2012). L’esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: metodi, finalità, risultati, in: CELIA, F.; ULACCO, A. Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe e latine Pisa, Pisa University Press , p. 81-132.
FERRARI, F. (2017). Platone ha effettivamente identificato il demiurgo del Timeo e l’idea del bene della Repubblica? Riflessioni intorno a un’antica querelle filosófica. Χῶρα 15/16, p. 67-91.
FREDE, M. (1987). Numenius. ANRW , Band II, 36.2, p. 103-1075.
FRONTEROTTA F. (2011). Platone, Timeo, Milano, BUR.
FRONTEROTTA, F. (2014). Modello, copia, ricettacolo: monismo, dualismo o triade di principi nel Timeo? Methexis 27, p. 47-66.
FRONTEROTTA, F. (2020). Panteles zōion e pantelōs on: Vita, anima e movimento intelligibile nel Timeo (e nel Sofista), in: JORGENSON, C.; KARFIK, F.; ŠPINKA, Š. Plato’s Timaeus. Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Platonicum Pragense Leiden, Brill , p. 49-69.
JOURDAN, F. (2014). La matiére a l’origine du mal chez Numénius (fr. 43 et 52 des Places). Philosophie Antique 14, p. 185-235.
MICHALEWSKI, A. (2012). Le Premier de Numénius et l’Un de Plotin. Archives de Philosophie 75, n.2, p. 29-48.
MICHALEWSKI, A. (2021). Constructing Authority. A Re-examination of Some Controversial Issues in the Theology of Numenius, in: ERLER, M.; HEßLER, J.E.; PETRUCCI, F.M. Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 130-148.
OPSOMER, J. (2005). Demiurge in Early Imperial Platonism. In: HIRSCH-LUIPOLD, R. Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder-Göttesbildes-Weltbilder Berlin-Boston, De Gruyter, p. 51-99.
PETRUCCI F.M. (2015). L’esegesi e il commento di Platone (a partire dalla cosmogonia del Timeo). Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 2, p. 295-320.
PETRUCCI, F.M. (2021). Lo sguardo del demiurgo (Timeo 28A6-29A5) e la semantica di blepo nei dialoghi platonici, in: ARONADIO, F. Variazioni sul tema del vedere. Saggi sui verba videndi nella grecità classica, Napoli, Bibliopolis p. 89-120.
TARRANT, H. (2004). Must Commentators know their Sources? Proclus “In Timaeum” and Numenius. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, 83, p. 175-190.
VIMERCATI, E. (2012). La materia e il male in Numenio di Apamea. Filosofia e Teologia 26, p. 77-92.
VIMERCATI, E. (ed.) (2015). Medioplatonici. Testimonianze e frammenti, Bompiani, Milano.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Enrico Volpe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
