What is Gorgias’ ‘not being’? A brief journey through the Treatise, the Apology of Palamedes and the Encomium of Helen

Authors

  • Erminia Di Iulio Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata” – Roma – Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_26

Keywords:

Gorgias, not-being, falsehood, philosophy of language, epistemology

Abstract

Assuming that a nihilist reading of Gorgias’ thought is to be ruled out, the issue of ‘not being’ remains one of the thorniest in his philosophy; indeed, it is fair to conclude that Gorgias is deeply concerned with ‘not being’. But what, after all, is Gorgias’ ‘not being’? This paper aims to answer this crucial question, by taking into consideration Gorgias’ main texts (i.e. the Treatise, the Apology of Palamedes and the Encomium of Helen). Each of them provides a serious – although not always explicit – account of ‘not being’. Overall, the aim is to show that Gorgias’ account of ‘not being’ is not concerned with ‘non-existence’ at all. It is deeply concerned, however, with falsehood and language. The paper will, therefore, be structured as follows: in part 1, the Treatise and specifically the the first section of the Particular Proof will be addressed and its ‘linguistic’ conception of ‘not-being’ fully exploited; in part 2, the Apology of Palamedes will be taken into account, in order to enucleate its ‘not-being-as-falsehood’ argument; the results from part 1 and part 2 will allow us, in part 3, to provide an analysis of the Encomium of Helen which points at its underlying conception of ‘not-being’.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ARONADIO, F. (2018). L’articolazione argomentativa di Plat. Soph. 237b7-239a11 e la natura del medamos on. Elenchos 39, 1 p. 57-98.

BERMUDEZ, J. P. (2017). Truth and Falsehood for Non-representationalist: Gorgias on the normativity of language. Journal of ancient philosophy 11, 2, p. 1-21.

BONAZZI, M. (2010). I Sofisti. Roma, Carocci.

CALOGERO, G. (1977). Studi sull’Eleatismo. Firenze, La Nuova Italia.

CASERTANO, G. (2015). Da Parmenide di Elea al Parmenide di Platone, Eleatica 2011, In: GAMBETTI, F.; GIOMBINI, S. (eds) Academia Verlag: Sankt Augustin.

CRANE, T. (2013) The objects of thought. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

CURD, P. (2006). Gorgias and the Eleatics. In: SASSI, M. M. (ed.). La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici. Pisa, Edizioni della Normale, p. 183-198.

DONNELLAN, K. S. (1974). Speaking of nothing. The Philosophical Review 83, 1, p. 3-31.

GIOMBINI, S. (2012), Gorgia epidittico. Commento filosofico all’Encomio di Elena, all’Apologia di Palamede, all’Epitaffio. Aguaplano, Passignano sul Trasimeno.

KAHN, C. (1966) The Greek verb “to be” and the concept of being. Foundations of Language 2, 3, p. 245-268.

KAHN, C (1969). The thesis of Parmenides. The Review of Metaphysics 22, 4, p. 700-724.

KERFERD, G. B (1955). Gorgias on nature or which is not. Phronesis 1, 1 p. 3-25.

IOLI, R. (2010). Gorgia di Leontini. Su ciò che non è. Hidelsheim, Olms.

IOLI, R. (2013). Gorgia. Testimonianze e Frammenti Roma, Carroci.

IOLI, R. (2018). Il felice inganno. Poesia finzione e verità nel mondo antico. Milano, Mimesis.

MANSFELD, J. (1988). De Melisso Xenophane Gorgia: Pyrrhonizing Aristotelianism. Rheinisches Museum CXXI, p. 239-276.

MAZZARA, G. (1982) Gorgia. Ontologo e metafisico Palermo, ILA Palma.

RUSSELL, B. (1905) On denoting. Mind, New Series 14, 56, p. 479-493.

SERRA, M. (2012) Elogio del disaccordo: per una filosofia politica del linguaggio. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 6, 3, p. 121-132.

STRAWSON, P. F. (1950). On Referring. Mind, New Series 59, 235, p. 320-344.

UNTERSTEINER, M., I Sofisti. Milano, Bruno Mondadori.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-17

How to Cite

Di Iulio, E. (2021). What is Gorgias’ ‘not being’? A brief journey through the Treatise, the Apology of Palamedes and the Encomium of Helen. Revista Archai, (31). https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_26

Issue

Section

Dossier Archai: Peri tou (me) ontos