Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9

Authors

  • Edgar González-Varela Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_30_30

Keywords:

particularity, Plato, separation, substance, universals

Abstract

Aristotle formulates in Metaphysics M.9 an aporia about Forms, according to which, those who introduce Forms make them universal substances and, at the same time, separate entities and, hence, particulars. But, he claims, it is not possible that both attributes, being a universal and being a particular, inhere in the same thing. The interpretation that scholars have offered of this objection is external, in that they hold that it derives from Aristotle’s own conception of separation: only what is particular is separate. Here I defend an internal interpretation which claims that the objection derives from an assumption about the explanatory role of Forms that Aristotle attributes to the Platonists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALLEN, R. E. (1960). Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues. Philosophical Review 69, p. 147-164.

ANNAS, J. (1976). Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Books M and N. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

APOSTLE, H. G. (1966). Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

CATTANEI, E. (1996). Enti matematici e metafisica. Platone, l’Accademia e Aristotele a confronto. Milano, Vita e Pensiero.

CHERNISS, H. (1944). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press.

CORKUM, P. (2008). Aristotle on Ontological Dependence. Phronesis 53, p. 65-92.

CRUBELLIER, M. (1994). Les livres “Mu” et “Nu” de la Métaphysique d’Aristote : traduction et commentaire. Thèse de doctorat en Philosophie. Lille, Université Charles De Gaulle Lille 3.

FINE, G. (1984). Separation. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2, p. 31-87.

FINE, G. (1993). On Ideas: Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

HAYDUCK, M. (ed.) (1881). Alexander Aphrodisiensis. In Aristotelis Metaphysica commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 1:1. Berlin, Reimer.

JAEGER, W. (ed.) (1957). Aristotelis Metaphysica. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

KROLL, W. (ed.) (1902). Syrianus. In Metaphysica commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 6:1. Berlin, Reimer.

NEHAMAS, A. (1979). Self-Predication and Plato’s Theory of Forms. American Philosophical Quarterly 16, p. 93-103.

REEVE, C. D. C. (2016). Aristotle. Metaphysics. Indianapolis, Hackett.

ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1924). Aristotle’s Metaphysics. 2 vols. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

SEDLEY, D. (1998). Platonic Causes. Phronesis 43, p. 114-132.

VLASTOS, G. (1974). A Note on ‘Pauline Predications’ in Plato. Phronesis 19, p. 95-101.

Archai 30 (2020 [3])

Downloads

Published

2020-10-04

How to Cite

González-Varela, E. (2020). Aristotle’s objection against Forms in Metaphysics M.9. Revista Archai, (30), e03030. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_30_30

Issue

No. 30 (2020): Archai 30 (2020 [3])

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Edgar González-Varela

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.

1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.