Like “bronze statues”

on the role of silence in Socratic dialogues

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_28_8

Keywords:

silence, paideia, Socratic dialogue, Aeschines, Plato

Abstract

The paper aims to examine some references to the theme of silence within Socratic dialogues. More particularly, the analysis focuses on the importance recognized to the virtue of σιωπᾶν in two specific fields: 1) the education of youth and 2) the dialogical exchange. The first aspect is investigated mainly through the exam of Aeschines’ Miltiades, which depicts positively the ability in young people to remain silent (Stob. 2.31, 23; Plu. De recta rat. aud. 4 p. 39b-c) and presents close parallels, in this regard, with some non-Socratic works (especially X. Lac. 3.5 and Isoc. Bus. 28-29). The second aspect, not unrelated to the former, is dealt with by taking into account a reference to the role of silence in Plato’s Protagoras (329b), which sheds light on its anti-Sophistic overtone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADORNO, F. (ed.) (1996). Platone. Protagora. Roma/Bari, Laterza.
ARRIGHETTI, G.; PULIGA, D. (ed.) (1995). Platone. Alcibiade Primo, Alcibiade Secondo. Introduzione di G. Arrighetti. Traduzione di D. Puliga. Milano, Rizzoli.
BERTI, E. (1978). Greek dialectic and free speech. Journal of the History of Ideas 39, p. 347-370.
BONAZZI, M. (ed.) (2011). Platone. Fedro. Torino, Einaudi.
CAPRA, A. (2001). AΓΩΝ ΛΟΓΩΝ: il « Protagora » di Platone tra eristica e commedia. Milano, LED.
CLARK, P. M. (1955). The Greater Alcibiades. Classical Quarterly 5, p. 231-240.
D’ALESSANDRO G. (ed.) (2009). Senofonte. Costituzione degli Spartani, Agesilao. Milano, Mondadori.
DITTMAR, H. (1912). Aischines von Sphettos. Studien zur Literaturgeschichte der Sokratiker. Berlin, Weidmann.
GIANNANTONI, G. (1990). Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae. Collegit, disposuit, apparatibus notisque. Napoli, Bibliopolis.
GIANNANTONI, G. (2005). Dialogo socratico e nascita della dialettica nella filosofia di Platone. Napoli, Bibliopolis.
HERMANN, K. F. (1850). De Aeschinis Socratici reliquiis. Göttingen, Universitätsschriften.
HIRZEL, R. (1895). Der Dialog. Ein literarhistorischer Versuch. Leipzig, S. Hirzel.
HORKY, P. S. (2013). Plato and Pythagoreanism. New York, Oxford University Press.
KRAUSS, H. (1911). Aeschinis Socratici Reliquiae. Lipsiae, B. G. Teubner.
MÁRSICO, C. (2014). Los filósofos socráticos. Testimonios y fragmentos. Vol. 2: Antístenes, Fedón, Esquines y Simón. Buenos Aires, Editorial Losada.
MEINEKE, A. (1856). Ioannis Stobaei Florilegium. Lipsiae, B. G. Teubner.
MERKELBACH, R. (1972). Zum Miltiades des Aischines. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 9, p. 201.
MORIANI, F. (1988). ΣΕΜΝΩΣ ΠΑΝΥ ΣΙΓΑΙ (Fedro 257 D 6): i luoghi platonici del silenzio. Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici 10, p. 27-64.
MOST, G. W. (1998). A la recherche du texte perdu: On Collecting Philosophical Fragments. In: BURKERT, W.; et al. Fragmentsammlungen philosophischer Texte der Antike. Le raccolte dei frammenti di filosofi antichi. Atti del Seminario Internazionale Ascona, Centro Stefano Fanscini 22-27 Settembre 1996. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, p. 1-15.
PATZER, A. (1974). Aischínou Miltiádes. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 15, p. 271-287.
PENTASSUGLIO, F. (2017). Eschine di Sfetto. Tutte le testimonianze. Turnhout, Brepols.
PENTASSUGLIO, F. (2020). L’éloge du silence : une polémique anti-éristique chez Eschine ? In: DELCOMMINETTE, S.; LACHANCE, G. (éds.). L’Éristique : Définitions, caractérisations et historicité. Paris, Vrin. (Forthcoming)
RIEDWEG, C. (2007). Pitagora. Vita, dottrina e influenza. Milano, Vita e Pensiero. (Pub. orig.: Pythagoras. Leben, Lehre, Nachwirkung, München, C. H. Beck, 2002)
ROSSETTI, L. (1989). Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini. Vol. I.1: Autori noti. Firenze, Olschki, p. 123-128; 135-136; 140-142.
ROSSETTI, L.; LAUSDEI, C. (1979a). Su P. Oxy 2890 Front. Dal Milziade di Eschine Socratico. Aegyptus 59, p. 91-96.
ROSSETTI, L.; LAUSDEI, C. (1979b). Ancora sul Milziade di Eschine Socratico: POxy. 2890 (Back). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 33, p. 47-56.
ROSSETTI, L.; LAUSDEI, C. (1981). POxy. 2889 e il Milziade di Eschine Socratico. Rheinisches Museum 124, p. 154-165.
RYLE, G. (1966). Dialectic in the Academy. In: BAMBROUGH, R. (ed.). New essays on Plato and Aristotle. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, p. 39-68.
SCHNEIDEWIN, F. W.; VON LEUTSCH, E. L. (1965). Corpus paroemiographorum graecorum. 2 Bände. Hildesheim, G. Olm. (Rist. anast. dell’ed. Göttingen 1839).
SICHIROLLO, L. (1973). Dialettica. Milano, Isedi.
SLINGS, S. (1975). Some remarks on Aeschines’ Miltiades. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 16, p. 301-308.
SMITH, N. D. (2004). Did Plato write the Alcibiades I? Apeiron 37, n. 2, p. 93-108.
THESLEFF, H. (1965). The pythagorean texts of the Hellenistic period. AÌŠbo, Ã…bo Akademi. (Acta Academiae Aboensis, Series A, Humaniora 30, 1)
ZHMUD, L. (2012). Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. Trans. K. Windle & R. Ireland. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Archai 28 (2020 [1])

Downloads

Published

2019-12-06

How to Cite

Pentassuglio, F. (2019). Like “bronze statues”: on the role of silence in Socratic dialogues. Revista Archai, (28), e02808. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_28_8

Issue

No. 28 (2020): Archai 28 (2020 [1])

Section

Articles

License

Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.

1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.