Theurgy and Transhumanism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_29_5

Keywords:

theurgy, Iamblichus, magic, technology, transhumanism

Abstract

Theurgy was a system of magical practices in the late Roman Empire. It was applied Neoplatonism. The theurgists aimed to enable human bodies to assume divine attributes, that is, to become deities. I aim to show that much of the structure of theurgical Neoplatonism appears in transhumanism. Theurgists and transhumanists share a core Platonic-Pythagorean metaphysics. They share goals and methods. The theurgists practiced astrology, the reading of entrails, the consultation of oracles, channeling deities, magic, and the animation of statues. The transhumanist counterparts of those practices are genetics, self-tracking with biosensors, artificial intellects like Google and Siri, brain-computer interfaces, programming, and robotics. Transhumanist techno-theurgy shows how Neoplatonism can be a modern philosophical way of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AUPERS, S. (2010). ‘Where the zeroes meet the ones’: Exploring the affinity between magic and computer technology. In: AUPERS, S.; HOUTMAN, D. Religions of Modernity: Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital. Boston, Brill, p. 219-238.

BETZ, H. D. (ed.) (1986). The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

BOSTROM, N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly 53, n. 211, p. 243-255.

CLARKE, E.; DILLON, J.; HERSHBELL, J. (2003). Iamblichus. De Mysteriis. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.

CLAY, J. (1982). Immortal and ageless forever. The Classical Journal 77, n. 2, p. 112-117.

CODESPELLS (2019). Available at https://codespells.org.

COLLINS, D. (2008). Mapping the entrails: The practice of Greek hepatoscopy. American Journal of Philology 129, n. 3, p. 319-345.

DAVIS, E. (2015). TechGnosis: Myth, Magic, and Mysticism in the Age of Information. Berkeley, North Atlantic Books.

DE GARIS, H. (2005). The Artilect War: Cosmists vs. Terrans. A Bitter Controversy Concerning whether Humanity should Build Godlike Massively Intelligent Machines. Palm Springs, ETC Publications.

DILLON, J. (2007). Iamblichus’ defense of theurgy: Some reflections. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 1, p. 30-41.

DILLON, J. (2016). The divinizing of matter: Some reflections on Iamblichus’ theurgic approach to matter. In: HALFWASSE, J.; et al. (eds.). Soul and Matter in Neoplatonism. Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg Press, p. 177-188.

DODDS, E. R. (1947). Theurgy and its relation to Neoplatonism. The Journal of Roman Studies 37, n. 1/2, p. 55-69.

FRODING, B. (2013). Virtue Ethics and Human Enhancement. New York, Springer.

HADOT, P. (1995). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Trans. M. Chase. Ed. A. Davidson. Malden, Wiley-Blackwell.

HARARI, Y. (2015). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York, Vintage.

HARRISON, P.; WOLYNIAK, J. (2015). The history of ‘transhumanism’. Notes and Queries 62, n. 3, p. 465-467.

HEIM, M. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. New York, Oxford University Press.

HILLIS, D. (1998). The Pattern on the Stone: The Simple Ideas that Make Computers Work. New York, Basic Books.

HUGHES, J. (2010). Contradictions from the Enlightenment roots of transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, p. 622-640.

JABLONKA, E. (2013). Some problems with genetic horoscopes. In: KRIMSKY, S.; GRUBER, J. (eds.). Genetic Explanations: Sense and Nonsense. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, p. 72-80.

JAROFF, L. (1989). The gene hunt. Time Magazine (20 March), p. 62-67.

JOHNSTON, S. (2008). Animating statues: A case study in ritual. Arethusa 41, n. 3, p. 445-477.

KANG, M. (2011). Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

KELLY, K. (2010). What Technology Wants. New York, Viking.

KURZWEIL, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York, Viking.

LAGRANDEUR, K. (2013). Androids and Intelligent Networks in Early Modern Literature and Culture: Artificial Slaves. New York, Routledge.

LEVIN, S. (2017). Antiquity’s missive to transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42, p. 278-303.

LEWY, Y. (1978). Chaldean Oracles and Theurgy: Mysticism, Magic, and Platonism in the Later Roman Empire. Paris, Etudes Augustiniennes.

MAYOR, A. (2018). Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

MCQUILLAN, D. (2018). Data science as machinic Neoplatonism. Philosophy and Technology 31, n. 2, p. 253-272.

MEADOWS, D. H.; ROBINSON, J. (1985). The Electronic Oracle: Computer Models and Social Decisions. New York, Wiley.

MORAVEC, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

MORAVEC, H. (2000). Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. New York, Oxford University Press.

NOBLE, D. (1999). The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York, Penguin.

PATCH, C.; et al. (2009). Genetic horoscopes: is it all in the genes? Points for regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. European Journal of Human Genetics 17, p. 857-859.

PETERS, T. (2018). Imago Dei, DNA, and the transhuman way. Theology and Science 16, n. 3, p. 353-362.

SANDBERG, A. (1999). The physics of information processing superobjects: Daily life among the Jupiter brains. Journal of Evolution and Technology 5, n. 1, p. 1-34.

SHAW, G. (1993). The geometry of grace: A Pythagorean approach to theurgy. In: BLUMENTHAL, H.; CLARK, E. (eds.). The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods. London, Bristol Classical Press, p. 116-137.

SHAW, G. (1999). Eros and Arithmos: Pythagorean theurgy in Iamblichus and Plotinus. Ancient Philosophy 19, p. 121-143.

SHAW, G. (2013). “Theurgy”. In: BAGNAL, R.; et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Ancient History. New York, Blackwell, p. 6714-6715.

SHAW, G. (2014). Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. 2ed. Kettering, Angelico Press.

STEINHART, E. (2008). Teilhard de Chardin and transhumanism. Journal of Evolution and Technology 20, p. 1-22.

STEINHART, E. (2014). Your Digital Afterlives: Computational Theories of Life after Death. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

STOHOLSKI, M. (2007). “Welcome to heaven, please watch your step”: The “Mithras Liturgy” and the Homeric quotations in the Paris Papyrus. Helios 34, n. 1, p. 69-95.

TEILHARD DE CHARDIN, P. (2002). The Phenomenon of Man. Trans. B. Wall. New York, Harper Collins. (Pub. Orig. 1955)

TIPLER, F. (1995). The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead. New York, Anchor Books.

VERLINDE, E. (2016). Emergent gravity and the dark universe. SciPost Physics 2, n. 3.016, p. 1-41.

WALKER, M. (2005). When transhumanism engages religion. Journal of Evolution and Technology 14, n. 2, p. i-xv.

WOLFRAM, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Champaign, Wolfram Media.

ZHANG, S. (2017). The DNA test as horoscope: Inside the growing world of lifestyle genetic tests. The Atlantic. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/01/the-dna-test-as-horoscope/514172/. Accessed 15 May 2018.

Archai 29 (2020 [2])

Downloads

Published

2020-03-28

How to Cite

Steinhart, E. C. (2020). Theurgy and Transhumanism. Revista Archai, (29), e02905. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_29_5

Issue

No. 29 (2020): Archai 29 (2020 [2])

Section

Dossier

License

Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.

1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.