Electronic Evidence of Anti-Money Laundering Regimes
A Comparative Study Between United Kingdom, United States and Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v16i1.48449Schlagworte:
Electronic Evidence. Anti-Money Laundering. Cryptocurrencies. Comparative Law.Abstract
[Purpose] To explore how comparing proof with countries with substantial cryptographic transaction volumes and preparedness to perpetrate crypto money laundering crimes, such as the US and UK, can revolutionise eradicating money laundering crimes in Indonesia.
[Methodology/approach/design] This study compares laws and regulations in Indonesia, the US, and the UK and examines how electronic evidence and expert witnesses can be crucial to crypto money laundering proof under each country's criminal procedural law. The study also examines how cryptocurrencies, blockchain systems, and emerging technologies impact law enforcement and legislators' approach to the AML regime.
[Findings] The research reveals that, unlike in the US and UK, electronic evidence is not regulated in formal criminal procedure law in Indonesia. The US and UK have defined criteria for gathering and removing electronic evidence to ensure authenticity, validity, and integrity so that it may be generally accepted in court. The study recommends standardised protocols for the collection and analysis of electronic evidence, international protocols to coordinate anti-money laundering efforts across jurisdictions, mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability in the collection and use of electronic evidence, and investments in technology and training to ensure law enforcement agencies have the tools and knowledge to use electronic evidence effectively.
[Practical implications] The study's recommendations have practical implications for the Indonesian government, law enforcement agencies, and legislators. Adopting international protocols, standardised protocols for electronic evidence, and investing in technology and training can improve the anti-money laundering regime and aid Indonesia's fight against money laundering crimes.
[Originality/value] This study contributes to understanding how electronic evidence and expert witnesses can be crucial to crypto money laundering proof under each country's criminal procedural law. The study's recommendations provide a roadmap for improving the anti-money laundering regime in Indonesia. They can be used as a reference for countries facing similar challenges in combating money laundering crimes.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
Akbar, D. L. (2019). Criminal Law Policy in Handling Digital Asset-Based Money Laundering in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(1), 129–176. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i1.35543
Akhtar, M., & Feng, T. (2022). Using Blockchain to Ensure the Integrity of Digital Forensic Evidence in an IoT Environment. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Creative Technologies, 174089. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2022.174089
Alammary, A., Alhazmi, S., Almasri, M., & Gillani, S. (2019). Blockchain-Based Applications in Education: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122400
Alkadri, S. (2018). Defining and Regulating Cryptocurrency: Fake Internet Money or Legitimate Medium of Exchange? Duke Law & Technology Review, 17(1), 71–98.
Anthony Das, C., Prasad, K., & Sadique, M. S. (2018). Cryptocurrency a Bit Unregulated? International Conference on Business and Banking V (ICBB V). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3298609
Bains, P., Ismail, A., Melo, F., & Sugimoto, N. (2022). Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Unbacked Crypto Assets. FinTech Notes, 2022(007). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fintech-notes/Issues/2022/09/26/Regulating-the-Crypto-Ecosystem-The-Case-of-Unbacked-Crypto-Assets-523715
Bhat, P. I. (2015). Comparative Method of Legal Research: Nature, Process and Potentiality. Journal of the Indian Law Institute, 57(2), 147–173. JSTOR.
Calafos, M. W., & Dimitoglou, G. (2023). Cyber Laundering: Money Laundering from Fiat Money to Cryptocurrency. In K. Daimi, I. Dionysiou, & N. El Madhoun (Eds.), Principles and Practice of Blockchains (pp. 271–300). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10507-4_12
Campbell-Verduyn, M. (2018). Bitcoin, Crypto-Coins, and Global Anti-Money Laundering Governance. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9756-5
Chawki, M. (2022). Cybercrime and the Regulation of Cryptocurrencies. In K. Arai (Ed.), Advances in Information and Communication (pp. 694–713). Springer International Publishing.
Coelho, R., Fishman, J., & Ocampo, D. G. (2021). Supervising Cryptoassets for Anti-Money Laundering. Bank for International Settlements, Financial Stability Institute.
de Haro-Olmo, F. J., Varela-Vaca, Á. J., & Álvarez-Bermejo, J. A. (2020). Blockchain from the Perspective of Privacy and Anonymisation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 20(24), 7171. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247171
DeWaal, G., & Dempsey, G. (2015). New York BitLicense regulations virtually certain to significantly impact transactions in virtual currencies. Journal of Investment Compliance, 16(4), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-08-2015-0047
Dumchikov, M., Reznik, O., & Bondarenko, O. (2023). Peculiarities of Countering Legalization of Criminal Income with the Help of Virtual Assets: Legislative Regulation and Practical Implementation. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-12-2021-0135
Dupuis, D., Smith, D., & Gleason, K. (2023). Old Frauds with a New Sauce: Digital Assets and Space Transition. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2021-0242
Elizondo, D. A., Solanas, A., & Martinez-Balleste, A. (2012). Computational Intelligence for Privacy and Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Fletcher, E., Larkin, C., & Corbet, S. (2021). Countering Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing: A Case for Bitcoin Regulation. Research in International Business and Finance, 56, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101387
Fujiwara, B. (2023). A study on Non-Performing Assets Cases and Cryptocurrency in Japan (arXiv:2302.07619). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.07619
Garcia-Teruel, R. M., & Simón-Moreno, H. (2021). The Digital Tokenization of Property Rights. A Comparative Perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 41, 105543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105543
Gelemerova, L. (2009). On the Frontline Against Money-Laundering: The Regulatory Minefield. Crime, Law and Social Change, 52(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-008-9175-8
Goldbarsht, D., & de Koker, L. (2022). Financial Technology and the Law: Combating Financial Crime. Springer International Publishing.
Habib, G., Sharma, S., Ibrahim, S., Ahmad, I., Qureshi, S., & Ishfaq, M. (2022). Blockchain Technology: Benefits, Challenges, Applications, and Integration of Blockchain Technology with Cloud Computing. Future Internet, 14(11), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110341
HM Treasury. (2015). UK National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing. HM Treasury and Home Office,. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Methodsandtrends/Ml-tf-risks.html
Jones, N., George, E., Merida, F., Ramussen, U., & Volzow, V. (2020). Electronic Evidence Guide-A Basic Guide for Police Officers, Prosecutors, and Judges. Cybercrime Division Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law. https://rm.coe.int/c-proc-electronic-evidence-guide-2-1-en-june-2020-web2/16809ed4b4
Karagiannis, C., & Vergidis, K. (2021). Digital Evidence and Cloud Forensics: Contemporary Legal Challenges and the Power of Disposal. Information, 12(5), 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12050181
Khan, A. S., Sumaila, U. R., Watson, R., Munro, G., & Pauly, D. (2006). The nature and magnitude of global non-fuel fisheries subsidies. In Fisheries Centre research reports. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia.
Levi, M., & Gilmore, W. (2002). Terrorist Finance, Money Laundering and the Rise and Rise of Mutual Evaluation: A New Paradigm for Crime Control? In M. Pieth (Ed.), Financing Terrorism (pp. 87–114). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48044-1_6
Manshur, M., Rodliyah, R., & Amiruddin, A. (2019). Analysis of Electronic Evidence as an Evidence Tools in Criminal Case Post Decision of Constitutional Court Number: 20/PUU-XVI/2016. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(2), 770–783. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.819
Mason, S., & Seng, D. (Eds.). (2017). Electronic Evidence. University of London Press; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv512x65
Mohamad, A. M. (2019). Admissibility and Authenticity of Electronic Evidence in the Courts of Malaysia and United Kingdom. International Journal of Law Government and Communication, 4(15), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijlgc.4150013
Montasari, R. (2016). Digital Evidence: Disclosure and Admissibility in the United Kingdom Jurisdiction. In H. Jahankhani, A. Carlile, D. Emm, A. Hosseinian-Far, G. Brown, G. Sexton, & A. Jamal (Eds.), Global Security, Safety and Sustainability—The Security Challenges of the Connected World (pp. 42–52). Springer International Publishing.
Moussa, A. F. (2021). Electronic Evidence and Its Authenticity in Forensic Evidence. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6
Muttaqim, M., & Apriliani, D. (2019). Analysis of The Probability of Money Laundering Crimes toward the Development of Crypto-currency Regulations in Indonesia. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i1.18714
Othman, A. H. A., Alhabshi, S. M., Kassim, S., & Sharofiddin, A. (2020). The Impact of Cryptocurrencies Market Development on Banks’ Deposits Variability in the GCC Region. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-02-2019-0036
Partida, A., Gerassis, S., Criado, R., Romance, M., Giráldez, E., & Taboada, J. (2022). Modeling Bitcoin plus Ethereum as an Open System of Systems of Public Blockchains to Improve Their Resilience against Intentional Risk. Electronics, 11(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11020241
Peters, G. W., Panayi, E., & Chapelle, A. (2015). Trends in Crypto-Currencies and Blockchain Technologies: A Monetary Theory and Regulation Perspective. CoRR, abs/1508.04364. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.04364
Peters, R. J., Loy, A. D., Osteen, M., Remy, J., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2021). Not an Ocean Away, Only a Moment Away: A Prosecutor’s Primer for Obtaining Remotely Stored Data. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 47(3), 1072–1128.
Putra, S. E., & Putranto, R. D. (2022). Legal Analysis of the Crime of Money Laundering Through Cryptocurrencies. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 8(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v8i2.3101
Read, C. L. (2022). No More Duffel Bags Full of Cash. In C. L. Read (Ed.), The Bitcoin Dilemma: Weighing the Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits (pp. 113–119). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09138-4_11
Reedy, P. (2023). Interpol Review of Digital Evidence for 2019–2022. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 6, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100313
Reynolds, P., & Irwin, A. S. M. (2017). Tracking Digital Footprints: Anonymity Within the Bitcoin System. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 20(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-07-2016-0027
Rovita, A., & Imanullah, M. N. (2018). Electronic Money as a Legal Payment Instrument in Indonesia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 15(5), 207–213.
Santoso, W. Y., Putra, A. A., Passagi, J. H., Hanindya, Y. R., & Tagar, A. A. (2019). Governing Blockchain-Based Token in Indonesia: Legal and Technical Perspective. Brawijaya Law Journal: Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2020.007.01.08
Sanz-Bas, D., del Rosal, C., Náñez Alonso, S. L., & Echarte Fernández, M. Á. (2021). Cryptocurrencies and Fraudulent Transactions: Risks, Practices, and Legislation for Their Prevention in Europe and Spain. Laws, 10(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10030057
Sarungu, C. M. (2020). Digital Lending High Level System Architecture in Indonesia. 2020 1st International Conference on Information Technology, Advanced Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICITAMEE), 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITAMEE50454.2020.9398429
Sharma, A. M. (2020). Cryptocurrency and Financial Risks [PhD Thesis]. Liberty University.
Siregar, F. R., & Sitorus, N. T. (2022). Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim Atas Vonis Nihil Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 9(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v9i2.7076
Stanfield, A. R. (2016). The Authentication of Electronic Evidence [PhD Thesis]. Queensland University of Technology.
Sukarno, K. S. & Pujiyono. (2020). The Use of Cryptocurrency as a Payment Instrument. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200321.048
Tan, B. S., & Low, K. Y. (2017). Bitcoin – Its Economics for Financial Reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12167
Trisakti, A., & Soponyono, E. (2021). Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Bentuk Uang Kripto (Bitcoin) Menggunakan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Perbankan. Jurnal Belo, 7(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol7issue1page37-54
Wang, S., & Zhu, X. (2021). Evaluation of Potential Cryptocurrency Development Ability in Terrorist Financing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(4), 2329–2340. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab059
Wardhana, A. T., & Nugroho, B. W. (2021). Abuse of Cryptocurrency to Funding International Terrorism Activities. Proceedings University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Undergraduate Conference, 1(1), 353–362.
Werbach, K. (2018). Trust, but Verify. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(2), 487–550. JSTOR.
Widhiyanti, H. N., Hussein, S. M., & Ganindha, R. (2023). Indonesian Cryptocurrencies Legislative Readiness: Lessons from the United States. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.2138.pp150-172
Zhou, L., Qin, K., & Gervais, A. (2021). A2MM: Mitigating Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges. CoRR, abs/2106.07371. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.07371
Zwitter, A., & Gstrein, O. J. (Eds.). (2021). Identity and Privacy Governance. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88971-413-1
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2024 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
