Combating Internet Fraud through Operative-Search Measures

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v16i2.50740

Keywords:

Cyberspace. Cybercrime. Crimes against property. Procedural actions. Crime prevention.

Abstract

[Purpose] Currently, the rapid development of Internet technologies leads to an increase in the number of fraud-related offences, which requires effective ways to prevent and detect them. The purpose of the study was to determine the essence, features, and problems of operative-search counteraction to Internet fraud.

[Methodology] The methodological basis of the study was formal and logical, system and structural analysis, ranking, and generalisation, which allowed: identifying current trends and indicators of cybercrime; clarifying the concept and content of operative-search counteraction to fraud on the Internet; conducting a legal analysis of the criminal law norms of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the EU in the field of fraudulent cybercrime; investigating the processes for identifying and preventing fraudulent cybercrimes by law enforcement institutions; highlighting certain aspects of protection against Internet fraud; analysing individual criminological strategies for preventing fraudulent crime using the Internet; identifying the features of interaction between government agencies in the field under study; considering key problematic issues of preventing fraudulent offences on the Internet and ways to solve them; revealing the prospects for the development of methods to combat fraudulent cybercrimes.

[Findings] The main results of the study were the definition of modern approaches to the interpretation of the concepts of “cybercrime,” “fraud,” “operative-search counteraction”; consideration of the regulatory support of Kazakhstan and the member states of the EU in the field of combating Internet fraud; clarification of the issue of criminal identification of fraudulent cybercrimes; clarification of practical aspects of operative-search measures to counteract fraudulent offences on the Internet; generalisation of possibilities for improving operative-search counteraction to fraud committed via the Internet. The significance of the results lies in the provision of practical recommendations regarding the concept and methods of operative-search counteraction to Internet fraud.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Samat Shaisultanov, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Doctoral Student. Faculty of Postgraduate Education, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Address: Utepov Str., 29, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050060. E-mail: sshaisultanov@gmail.com.

Talgat Akimzhanov, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Full Doctor in Law, Researcher. Research Center, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Address: Utepov Str., 29, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050060. E-mail: talgat.akimzhanov@outlook.com.

Boris Abdrakhmanov, Eurasian Law Academy

Full Doctor in Law, Professor. Department of Criminal Law Disciplines and Law Enforcement, Eurasian Law Academy named after D.A. Kunayev. Address: Kurmangazy Str., 107, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050022. E-mail: borisabdrakhmanov@proton.me.

Ardak Bazarlinova, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Senior Lecturer. Faculty No. 1 of Training of the Management Staff of the Department of Internal Affairs, M. Esbolatov Almaty Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Address: Utepov Str., 29, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050060. E-mail: ardakbazarlinova@hotmail.com.

Aida Bazarlinova, “Aikis Travel” Company

Senior Lecturer. “Aikis Travel” Company. Address: Kydyrov Str., 39A, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050006. E-mail: A.Bazarlinova@protonmail.com.

References

AL-KHAFAGY, B. M. S. (2020). International efforts to combat cybercrime. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 3034-3054.

ALKHALIL, Z., HEWAGE, C., NAWAF, L., & KHAN, I. (2021). Phishing attacks: A recent comprehensive study and a new anatomy. Frontiers in Computer Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.563060

AL-QAHTANI, A. F., & CRESCI, S. (2022). The COVID-19 scamdemic: A survey of phishing attacks and their countermeasures during COVID-19. IET Information Security, 16(5), 324-345.

BASHEER, R., & ALKHATIB, B. (2021). Threats from the dark: A review over dark web investigation research for cyber threat intelligence. Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, 2021, 1302999.

BAYDALA, B. D. (2020). Combating health care cyber crime. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 40(2), 15-20.

BUDAPEST CONVENTION ON CRIME IN CYBERSPACE DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2001. (2001). Available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_575

BUTTON, M. (2021). Hiding behind the veil of action fraud: The police response to economic crime in England and Wales and evaluating the case for regionalization or a National Economic Crime Agency. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(3), 1758-1772.

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. (2000). Official Journal of the European Communities, 364, 1-22. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf

CHUCHKO, S. (2020). Features of the interaction of law enforcement agencies in the investigation of fraud in the purchase and sale of goods via the Internet. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, 12, 267-271.

COTOC, C. N., NITU, M., SCHEAU, M. C., & COZMA, A. C. (2021). Efficiency of money laundering countermeasures: Case studies from European Union member states. Risks, 9(6), 120.

CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN DATED JULY 3, 2014. No. 226-V (as amended and supplemented as of March 26, 2023). (2023). Available at: https://online.zakon.kz/m/amp/document/31575252

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law. 2017. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017L1371

DIRECTIVE 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. (1995). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31995L0046

EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12, 13 and 16, dated September 3, 1953. (1950). Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

FANG, W., LI, X., ZHOU, P., YAN, J., JIANG, D., & ZHOU, T. (2021). Deep Learning anti-fraud model for internet loan: Where we are going. IEEE Access, 9, 9777-9784.

GUNDUR, R. V., LEVI, M., TOPALLI, V., OUELLET, M., STOLYAROVA, M., CHANG, L. Y. C., & MEJIA, D. D. (2021). Evaluating criminal transactional methods in cyberspace as understood in an international context. Available at: https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/48bmtkg0/release/3

KALIAKPAROV, D. 2023. More than 20 thousand cases of Internet fraud recorded in 2022. Available at: https://total.kz/ru/news/zhizn/bolee_20_tisyach_sluchaev_internetmoshennichestva_zafiksirovano_v_2022_godu_date_2023_01_23_13_30_33

KOZIARSKI, J., & LEE, J. R. (2020). Connecting evidence-based policing and cybercrime. Policing: An International Journal, 43(1), 198-211.

KRYSHEVYCH, O., ANDRUSHCHENKO, I., STRILTSIV, O., PYVOVAR, Y., & RIVCHACHENKO, O. (2021). Modern methods of computer-related fraud: Legal characteristics and qualification. Cuestiones Politicas, 39(68), 844-865.

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 22-V “On Informatisation”. (2015). Available at: https://online.zakon.kz

LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 154-XIII “On operational-search activity”. (1994). Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z940004000_

LI, G., WEN, Y. (2022). Research on the detection countermeasures of telecommunication network fraud based on big data for killing pigs and plates. Journal of Robotics, 2022, 4761230.

MCKOY, C. (2021). Law enforcement officers’ perceptions in combating cybercrime at the local level. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, 11204. Available at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/11204

MPHATHENI, M. R., & MALULEKE, W. (2022). Cybersecurity as a response to combating cybercrime: Demystifying the prevailing threats and offering recommendations to the African regions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 11(4), 384-396.

NEOGI, D. (2021). Combating cyber crime: How can technology intervention supplement legal provisioning? International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 12(6), 1-15.

NIVEDITA, J. (2023). 90+ cyber crime statistics 2023: Cost, industries & trends. Available at: https://www.getastra.com/blog/security-audit/cyber-crime-statistics/

NORRIS, G., BROOKES, A., & DOWELL, D. (2019). The psychology of Internet fraud victimisation: A systematic review. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34, 231-245.

REGULATION (EU) 2019/881 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No. 526/2013 (Cybersecurity). (2019). Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/881/oj/

REGULATORY RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NO. 1 “On some issues of application of legislation on the judiciary in the Republic of Kazakhstan”. (1998). Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P98000001S_

REZNIK, O., FOMENKO, A., MELNYCHENKO, A., PAVLOVA, N., & PROZOROV, A. (2021). Features of the initial stage of investigating fraud with financial resources in cyberspace. Amazonia Investiga, 10(41), 141-150.

SAMOILENKO, O., & TITUNINA, K. (2021). Internet fraud: technologies of performance, ways of counteraction and prevention. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, 2(16), 65-70.

SVIATUN, O. V., GONCHARUK, O. V., CHERNYSH, R., KUZMENKO, O., & KOZYCH, I. V. (2021). Combating cybercrime: Economic and legal aspects. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 18, 751-762.

SWIATKOWSKA, J. (2020). Tackling cybercrime to unleash developing countries’ digital potential. Oxford: Pathways for Prosperity Commission Background Paper Series.

TERLIKBAEV, D. (2022). Is it true that cybercrime in Kazakhstan has increased 10 times in 5 years? Available at: https://factcheck.kz/truth/pravda-li-chto-kiberprestupnost-v-kazaxstane-vyrosla-v-10-raz-za-5-let/

VAN NGUYEN, T., TRUONG, T. V., & LAI, C. K. (2022). Legal challenges to combating cybercrime: An approach from Vietnam. Crime, Law and Social Change, 77, 231-252.

WALKER, S. (2019). Cyber-insecurities? A guide to the UN cybercrime debate. Available at: https://globalinitiative.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/TGIATOC-Report-Cybercrime-in-the-UN-01Mar1510-Web.pdf

WANG, S. Y. K., HSIEH M. L., CHANG, C. K. M., JIANG, P. S., & DALLIER D. J. (2021). Collaboration between law enforcement agencies in combating cybercrime: Implications of a Taiwanese case study about ATM hacking. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(4), 390-408.

WERAPUN, W., KARODE, T., ARPORNTHIP, T., SUABOOT, J., SANGIAMKUL, E., BOONRAT, P. (2023). The flash loan attack analysis (FAA) framework – A case study of the warp finance exploitation. Informatics, 10(1), 3.

YERJANOV, T. K., BAIMAGAMBETOVA, Z. M., SERALIEVA, A. M., ZHAILAU, Z., & SAIRAMBAEVA, Z. T. (2017). Legal issues related to combating cybercrime: Experience of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(7), 2276-2291.

ZINGERLE, A., & KRONMAN, L. (2018). Internet crime and anti-fraud activism: A hands-on approach. Hershey: IGI Global.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

SHAISULTANOV, Samat; AKIMZHANOV, Talgat; ABDRAKHMANOV, Boris; BAZARLINOVA, Ardak; BAZARLINOVA, Aida. Combating Internet Fraud through Operative-Search Measures . Law, State and Telecommunications Review, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 2, p. 257–275, 2024. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v16i2.50740. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/50740. Acesso em: 16 oct. 2024.