The Content of the Right to Internet Access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v15i1.46859Keywords:
Right to the Internet. Broadband. Human Rights. Minimum Essential Content. Digital Divide.Abstract
[Purpose] Having internet access is essential for the full enjoyment of many human rights. Therefore, this Article aims to determine the minimum essential content of the right to the internet in order to both understand the extent to which it deserves protection and to verify compliance with the obligations it entails. We describe the evolving nature of internet and broadband access due to technological developments and social needs. We also present the different positions regarding internet access as a human right or not, as well as how this right is acknowledged in the Mexican Constitution.
[Methodology/Approach/Design] The methodology was the review and analysis of norms, case law, academic and public policy documents, as well as references to relevant statistical data. The scope of the paper is framed in the discussion of fundamental and human rights.
[Findings] The right to internet access has both a negative dimension and a positive one. The negative dimension consists of a State obligation not to limit or restrict the right to internet access. The positive dimension must be determined using the economic, social, and cultural rights standard of the four As, namely, availability, accessibility, acceptability, and adaptability. Finally, we propose the minimum essential content of the right to internet access on those four characteristics.
[Practical Implications] - This Article provides arguments and bases for the minimum essential content of the right to internet access and broadband which are relevant for policymakers, judicial decisions, and civil society. Also, the academic debate is and will be open on the subject matter of this paper insofar as the evolutionary nature of technology, demands a constant review and update of the minimum essential content of the right.
[Originality/Value] There is currently no literature regarding what a right to internet access and broadband would include as obligations to States and other parties.
Downloads
References
Abramovich, V. (2004). Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles. Madrid: Trotta.
Acuña, J. M. (2012). Justicia constitucional y políticas públicas sociales. México: Porrúa-Universidad Panamericana.
Alexy, R. (1991). Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Alvarez, C. (2011). Internet y derechos fundamentales. México: Porrúa.
Alvarez, C. (2018). Telecomunicaciones y radiodifusión en México. México: UNAM Posgrado en Derecho. Available at: http://derecho.posgrado.unam.mx/site_cpd/public/publis_cpd/telecomyradiodifenMX.pdf.
Anzures, J. (2020). Naturaleza jurídica y funciones del derecho humano a Internet. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, vol. 53 (158) pp. 539.
Arango, R. (2004). Derechos, constitucionalismo y democracia. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Becerra, J. (2015). Las obligaciones del estado: el nuevo derecho fundamental de acceso a internet y las garantías a partir de la redefinición de las clásicas libertades informativas. Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia. Available at: https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstream/10983/23002/1/La-responsabilidad-del-Estadoy-las-TIC_A0_2.pdf
Bobbio, N. (1993). Igualdad y libertad. Barcelona: Paidós.
Boza, G. (2015). El derecho de acceso a Internet y la libertad de expresión. Cuadernos de jurisprudencia de la Sala Constitucional de Costa Rica, Compilación. (n. 4) San José: CICOM-PROLEDI.
Bravo, J. (2020). Las telecomunicaciones y el acceso social a Internet. A seis años de la Ley Federal de Telecomunicaciones y Radiodifusión. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Brown, G. (2016). The Evolving Understanting of Rights. Global Citizenship Commission and Open Book Publishers (Eds.). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the 21st Century, pp. 39-56 Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1bpmb7v.10
Centro México Digital (2022). Panorama de la brecha de género en el acceso, asequibilidad y usos de la banda ancha y las competencias digitales en México. Available at: https://centromexico.digital/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/reporte-brecha-de-genero.pdf
Cerf, V. (2012). Internet Access Is Not a Human Right. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (1988). Velásquez Rodríguez vs. Honduras. Fondo, serie C, num. 4, parr. 165.
Cotino, L. (2012) El derecho a la educación como derecho fundamental. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
Cotino, L. (2020) Online-Offline. Las garantías para el acceso a internet y para la desconexión, bloqueo, filtrado y otras restricciones de la red y sus contenidos. Revista de Derecho Político (vol. 1) (108) pp. 13-40 Available at: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.108.2020.27991
Costa Rica’s Supreme Court of Justice (2010). Sentence 12790-2010. Available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_n7anxwm9Cd4fJT-rP6zt1vvjHMnA0DFibTV-AMmCg0/edit.
Custers, B. (2022). New digital rights: Imagining additional fundamental rights for the digital era. Computer Law and Security Review. (vol. 44) Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105636
Díez-Picazo, L. (2005). Sistema de Derechos Fundamentales. Madrid: Civitas.
Eighth District Court in San Luis Potosí (2019). Judicial Proceeding (Amparo) 365/2019-IV.
Eighth District Court in San Luis Potosí (2020). Sentence of the Judicial Proceeding (Amparo) 649/2020. Available at: http://sise.cjf.gob.mx/SVP/word1.aspx?arch=2071/2071000027028774027.pdf_1&sec=Diego_Galeana_Jimenez&svp=1
Elósegui, M. (2003). Las acciones positivas para la igualdad de oportunidades laborales entre mujeres y hombres. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
European Electronic Commmunications Code (2018). Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code [2018], published on the Official Journal of the European Union on December 17, 2018.
European Union (2016). Council of Europe - Recommendation (2016) 5 of 13 April 2016 Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on Internet freedom num. 5.2. Available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?Objec-tId=09000016806415fa#_ftn.
European Union (2022). Council Regulation 2022/1925 of 14 September 2022 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector and amending Directives (EU) 2019/1937 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Digital Markets Act) [2022] OJ L265/1.
Fossas, E. (1993). El derecho de acceso a los cargos públicos. Madrid: Tecnos.
Fifth District Court in San Luis Potosí (2021). Judicial Proceeding (Amparo) 325/2021.
Galperin, H. (2020). Granularity: The study of digital inequalities at the local level (LSE Department of Media and Communications). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZcqw-0uAUc&t=7s
García-Mora, F. & Mora-Rivera, J. (2007). Exploring The Impact Of Internet Access On Poverty: A Regional Analysis Of Rural Mexico. New media & society journal, vol. 25 (1) pp. 26-49 Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14614448211000650
García, P. (2012). El derecho de acceso a internet. Sociedad Digital y Derecho. Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
