About Borders, Horses and Gatekeepers

The Evolution of Interoperability and Networks Access Debate in Cyberlaw

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v15i2.45341

Keywords:

Gatekeeper. Interoperability. Network Access. Cyberlaw. Internet Regulation.

Abstract

[Purpose] To characterize the evolution of the regulatory debate on interoperability and network access in the evolutionary course of the Internet.

[Methodology] Based on bibliographical research on the academic publications of cyberlaw and study cases in the United States and Europe, the objectives and the role played by network access regulation are identified.

[Findings] From little or no regulatory concern in the early beginning of the Internet, interoperability converts itself into a relevant issue from the identification of the power asymmetries of the network participants, some of them being able even to limit or prevent the free flow of information, then the concept of gatekeeper arises. With the reorientation of the bargaining powers of the Internet supply chain, greater attention has been given to the content and application layer. Despite the challenges inherent to the sustainability of highly prescriptive regulatory designs, guarantees of interoperability are fundamental to the free flow of ideas, data and information, capable of preserving a free, plural and open to innovation Internet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fábio Casotti, Anatel

Pós-graduado em Planejamento e Estratégias de Desenvolvimento (ENAP/2018), especializado em Regulação Econômica (INATEL/2011) e Engenheiro de Telecomunicações (UNI-BH/2006). Servidor público da Agência Nacional de Telecomunicações (ANATEL) desde 2005. E-mail: fcasotti@gmail.com.

References

BRODKIN, Jon. Europe cracks down on data cap exemptions in update to net neutrality rules. ArsTechnica, jun. 2022.

CASTELLS, Manuel. O poder da comunicação. 2 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2017. 629 p.

CONSELHO ADMINISTRATIVO DE DEFESA ECONÔMICA. Concorrência em mercados digitais: uma revisão dos relatórios especializados. Brasília: CADE, 2020.

EASTERBROOK, Frank H. Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse. University of Chicago Legal Forum, v. 207, 1996.

EDELMAN, Gilad. The Senate Bill That Has Big Tech Scared. Wired, apr. 2022.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. Chairman Pai Statement On Revoking Midnight Regulations. Washington: FCC, 2017.

FINLEY, Klint. The WIRED Guide to Net Neutrality. Wired, may 2020.

FRANSMAN, M. The new ICT ecosystem: implications for policy and regulation. New York: Cambridge, 2010.

FRAZÃO, Ana de Oliveira. Big Data e aspectos concorrenciais no tratamento de dados pessoais. In: DONEDA, Danilo et al (Org.). Tratado de proteção de dados pessoais. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2021. p. 535-552.

IDG NEWS SERVICE. Court rules against FCC's Comcast net neutrality decision. Reuters, apr. 2010.

KASTRENAKES, Jacob. A timeline of Netflix’s conflicting stances on net neutrality. The Verge, mar 2017.

KATZ, Michael L.; SHAPIRO, Carl. Systems Competition and Network Effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, n. 2, p. 93–115, 1994.

KENT, Donald H. The Erie War of the Gauges. Pennsylvania History, vol. XV, n. 4, oct. 1948.

LAFFONT, Jean-Jacques; TIROLE, Jean. Creating competition through interconnection: theory and practice. Journal of Regulatory Economics, p. 227-256, 1996.

LAIDLAW, Emily. A framework for identifying Internet Information Gatekeepers. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 1-16, nov. 2010.

LASAR, Matthew. How AT&T conquered the 20th century. Wired, Business, sep. 2018.

LEMLEY, Mark A.; SAMUELSON, Pamela. Interfaces and Interoperability After Google v. Oracle. Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper, n. 562, aug. 2021.

LESSIG, Lawrence. The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach. Harvard Law Review, v. 113, n. 2, p. 501-549, 1999.

______. Voice-Over-IP's unlikely hero. Wired, may 2005.

______. Code: version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006.

LOMAS, Natasha. Europe’s top court slaps down ‘zero rating’ again. TechCrunch, sep. 2021.

MOTTA, Massimo. Competition policy: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 2004.

MURRAY, Andrew D. Nodes and Gravity in Virtual Space. Legisprudence, v. 5, n. 2, p. 195-221, jul. 2011.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Data portability, interoperability and digital platform competition. Paris: OECD, 2021.

PARLAMENTO EUROPEU E CONSELHO. Relativo à disputabilidade e equidade dos mercados no setor digital e que altera as Diretivas (UE) 2019/1937 e (UE) 2020/1828 (Regulamento dos Mercados Digitais). Bruxelas: União Europeia, 2022.

REIDENBERG, Joel R. Governing networks and rule-making in cyberspace. Emory Law Journal, v. 45, p. 911-930, 1996.

______. Lex informatica: The formulation of information policy rules through technology. Texas Law Review, v. 76, p. 553-593, 1998.

RIFKIN, J. The zero marginal cost society: the internet of things, the collaborative commons, and the eclipse of capitalism. New York: Macmillan, 2014.

SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1984.

SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES. S.2992 - 117th Congress (2021-2022). Washington: US Senate, 2022.

SHIELDS, Todd. Biden’s FCC is having trouble getting started. Bloomberg, Businessweek, Tehcnology, feb. 2022.

VAN SCHEWICK, Barbara. Network Neutrality: what a non-discrimination rule should look like. Stanford Public Law Working Paper, n. 402, p. , sep. 2010.

WU, Tim. Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. J. ON TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L., vol. 2, p. 141-175, 2003.

______. Impérios da comunicação: do telefone à internet, da AT&T ao Google. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2012.

YOO, Christopher S. Beyond Network Neutrality. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-77, 2005.

ZITTRAIN, Jonathan L. The future of the Internet: and how to stop it. Harrisonburg: Yale University Press, 2008.

Published

2023-09-07

How to Cite

CASOTTI, Fábio. About Borders, Horses and Gatekeepers: The Evolution of Interoperability and Networks Access Debate in Cyberlaw. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 16–41, 2023. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v15i2.45341. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/45341. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2024.