The Federal Supreme Court and the regulation of the social media: the metalanguage adopted by the court in the decision of the ADPF 130/DF

Authors

  • Oona de Oliveira Cajú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v9i1.21515

Keywords:

Regulation of social media. Libertarian and democratic theories. Free flow of information Self reliance. Freedom of speech and press.

Abstract

Purpose ”“ This article analyzes the votes uttered by the Federal Supreme Court justices at the trial of ADPF 130/DF, in which it was denied value to the Press Law. It also tackles the reasoning behind the Court’s decision, which clarifies its conception of regulation of the social media.Methodology/approach/design ”“ The first section of the article presents the most influent theoretical paradigms on the social media regulation. The second section confronts them with votes presented at the trial of the ADPF 130/DF and extract the guiding conceptual syntheses of the justices, identifying the regulatory paradigm of communicational field to which they align themselves.

Findings ”“ It was possible to identify that the libertarian paradigm of free flow of informartion is the predominant mindset guiding the rulings concerning social media in the Federal Supreme Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oona de Oliveira Cajú

Mestre em Ciências Jurídicas e Graduada em Direito pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB). É professora da Universidade Federal Rural do Semiárido (UFERSA), no Rio Grande do Norte, desde 2014 e coordenadora do Centro de Referência em Direitos Humanos do Semiárido, vinculado à UFERSA.

Published

2017-05-15

How to Cite

CAJÚ, Oona de Oliveira. The Federal Supreme Court and the regulation of the social media: the metalanguage adopted by the court in the decision of the ADPF 130/DF. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 93–124, 2017. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v9i1.21515. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21515. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2024.