O caso prático como método de ensino em teoria das relações internacionais

o programa nuclear iraniano segundo os níveis de análise

  • Vânia Carvalho Pinto Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília
  • Humberto Correa Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília
  • Fernanda de Medeiros Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília
Palavras-chave: Ensino, Caso Prático, Aprendizagem Ativa

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta o caso prático como instrumento importante para o desenvolvimento da aprendizagem ativa (active learning) no contexto do ensino de teoria das relações internacionais para alunos de graduação. Com foco no estimulo à aprendizagem e na retenção do conceito de níveis de análise, este artigo detalha a aplicação de um caso prático sobre o programa nuclear iraniano, e a sua respetiva resolução em sala de aula.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Vânia Carvalho Pinto, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Humberto Correa, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Fernanda de Medeiros, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília

Referências

AL-OTAIBA, Yousef. “In conversation: UAE Ambassador Yousef al-Otaiba.” The Aspen Institute: The Aspen Ideas Festival, 2010, Disponível em: < https://www.aspenideas.org/session/conversation-uae-ambassador-yousef-al-otaiba>. Acesso em: 30 de Abril de 2017.

ASHLEY, Richard K. “The poverty of neorealism”. International Organization, v. 38, n. 2, p. 225-286. 1984.

ANOUSHIRAVAN, Ehteshami. MAHJOOB, Zweiri. “The Ahmadinejad Phenomenon”. In: Iran and the Rise of its Neoconservatives: The Politics of Tehran’s Silent Revolution. London and New York: I. B. Tauris, p. 49-72. 2007.

BAR-EL, Zvi. A Year After His Election, Rohani Is Changing Iran Without Shaking It Up. Haaretz. Disponível em: <http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/.premium-1.598619>. Acesso em: 2 de março de 2017.

BARZEGAR, Kayhan. “Balance of Power in the Persian Gulf: an Iranian View”. Middle east Policy, v. 17, n. 3, p. 74-87. 2010.

BAZZI, Mohammad. “Obama may be preaching ‘tough love’ to Saudi – but arms sales tell another story”. The Guardian. Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/22/us-saudi-arabia-weapons-arms-deals-foreign-policy>. Acesso em: 20 de Março de 2017.

BUZAN, Barry. “The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered”. In: SMITH, Steve. BOOTH, Ken. International Relations Theory Today. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, p. 198-216. 1995.

CARVALHO PINTO, Vânia. “Teaching gender within International Relations: Experiences from a Brazilian University Classroom”. Women, Gender and Research 1. p. 32-42, 2016.

CHUBIN, Shahram. “Iran’s Power in Context”. Survival, v. 51, n.1, p. 165-190. 2009.

DEHGHAN, Saeed Khamali. “Sanctions on Iran: ordinary people are the target”. The Guardian. Disponível em: <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/aug/10/sanctions-iran-ordinary-people-target>. Acesso em: 1 de Março de 2017.

EL-SHENAWI, Eman. Goodbye Ahmadinejad: Remembering the gaffes and diplomatic blunders. Al-Arabyia English. Disponível em: <http://english.alarabiya.net/en/special-reports/iran-elections-2013/2013/06/13/Ahmadinejad-legacy-in-Iran-Economic-ruins-and-diplomatic-gaffes-.html>. Acesso em: 01 de Março de 2017.

GOLICH, Vicki L. “The ABCs of Case Teaching”. International Studies Perspectives 1, p. 11-29. 2000.

HOLLIS, Martin. SMITH, Steve. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

HOLLIS, Martin. SMITH, Steve. “Beware of the gurus: structure and action in International Relations”. Review of International Studies, v. 17, n. 4, p. 393-410. 1991.

HOLLIS, Martin. SMITH, Steve. “Structure and action: further comment”. Review of International Studies, v. 18, n. 2, p. 187-188. 1992.

Hurrell, Andrew. “One world? Many worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society”. International Affairs 83, n. 1, p. 127-146. 2007.

INOUE, Cristina Y. A. KRAIN, Matthew. “One World, Two Classrooms, Thirteen Days: Film as Active-Teaching and Learning Tool in Cross-National Perspective”. Journal of Political Science Education, v. 10, p. 424-442. 2014.

JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION [JCPA]. US State Department. Disponível em:

www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/iran/jcpoa/>. Acesso em: 20 de Fevereiro de 2017.

KATOUZIAN, Homa. “The Iranian Revolution at 30: The Dialectic of Stat and Society. Middle East Critique, v. 19, n. 1, p. 35-53. 2010.

KEOHANE, Robert. NYE, J. S. “Power and interdependence revisited”. International Organization, v. 41, n. 4, p. 725-753. 1987.

KRAIN, Matthew. “The Effects of Different Types of Case Learning on Student Engagement”. International Studies Perspectives, v. 11, p. 291-308. 2010.

LAMY, Steven L. “Challenging Hegemonic Paradigms and Practices: Critical Thinking and Active Learning Strategies for International Relations”. PS: Politican Science & Politics, v. 40, n. 1, p. 112-116. 2007.

LANTIS, Jeffrey S. KILLE, Kent J. KRAIN, Matthew. “The State of the Active Teaching and Learning Literature”. In: DENEMARK, Robert A. The International Studies Encyclopedia, Volume X. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. p. 6574-6592.

MENASHRI, David. “Hassan Rouhani: Iran’s New Hope for Change.” Strategic Assessment v. 16, n. 2, p. 7-21. 2013.

MORGAN, A. L. “Toward a Global Theory of Mind: The Potential Benefits of Presenting a Range of IR Theories through Active Learning”. International Studies Perspectives, v. 4, p. 351-370. 2003.

MOUL, William B. “The level of analysis problem revisited”. Canadian Journal of Political Science, v. 6, n. 3, p. 494-513. 1973.

PETERSON, Sabrina M. “Iran’s deteriorating economy: an analysis of the economic impact of Western sanctions”. International Affairs Review. Disponível em: <http://www.iar-gwu.org/node/428>. Acesso em: 10 de Dezembro de 2016.

PUTNAM, Robert. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”. International Organization, v. 42, n. 3, p. 427-460. 1988.

ROSENAU, J. N. “Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy”. In: FARELL, R. B. Approaches to Comparative and International Politics. Evanston: Northwestern University, 1966. p. 27-92.

SAGAN, Scott. WALTZ, Kenneth. BETTS, Richard K. “A Nuclear Iran: promoting stability our courting disaster?”. Journal of International Affairs, v. 60, n. 2, p. 135-150. 2007.

SINGER, J. David. “International Conflict: Three Levels of Analysis”. World Politics, v. 12, n. 3, p. 453-461. 1960.

SINGER, J. David. “The Level-of-analysis Problem in International Relations. World Politics v. 14, n. 1, p. 77-92. 1961.

SMOLTCZYK, Alexander. ZAND, Bernhard. “A quiet axis forms against Iran in the Middle East”. Spiegel Online. <http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/persian-isolation-a-quiet-axis-forms-against-iran-in-the-middle-east-a-706445.html>. Acesso em: 15 de Janeiro de 2016.

COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (CFR). “Statement by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad before the 2010 NPT Review Conference Council on Foreign Relations”. Disponível em: <http://www.cfr.org/iran/statementmahmoudahmadinejadbefore2010nptreviewconference/p22041>. Acesso em: 3 de Novembro de 2016.

TEMBY, Owen. “What are level of analysis and what do they contribute to international relations theory?”. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, v. 28, n. 4, p. 721-742. 2015.

THE INDEPENDENT.“Iran fires two missiles marked ‘Israel must be wiped out’”. Disponível em:<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-fires-two-ballistic-missiles-marked-israel-must-be-wiped-out-a6920741.html>. Acesso em: 1 de Março de 2017.

THE INDEPENDENT. “Iran nuclear deal won’t change policy towards US, says ayatollah Khamenei”. THEODOULOU, Michael. “Iran to build more nuclear reactors in Bushehr quake zone”. The National. Disponível em: <http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/iran-to-build-more-nuclear-reactors-in-bushehr-quake-zone>. Acesso em: 3 de Novembro de 2016.

WALTZ, Kenneth. Man, State & War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.

WALTZ, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

WENDT, Alexander. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory”. International Organization, v. 41, n. 3, p. 335-370. 1987.

WALTZ, Kenneth. “Why Iran should get the bomb: nuclear balancing would mean stability.” Foreign Affairs. Disponível em: <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/iran/2012-06-15/why-iran-should-get-bomb>. Acesso em: 3 de Novembro de 2016.

WAEVER, Ole. “The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate”. In: SMITH, Steve. BOOTH, Ken. ZALEWSKI, Marysia. International Theory: Positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 149-185.

WENDT, Alexander. “Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations”. Review of International Studies, v. 17, n. 4, p. 383-392. 1991.

WENDT, Alexander. “Level of Analysis vs. Agents and Structures: Part III”. Review of International Studies, v. 18, n. 2, p. 181-185. 1992.

WILLIAMS, Tripp. “What Khamenei’s approval of the nuclear deal means for Iran’s political future”. Global Risk Insights. Disponível em: <http://globalriskinsights.com/2016/03/what-khameneis-approval-of-the-nuclear-deal-means-for-irans-political-future>. Acesso em: 3 de Fevereiro de 2017.

YURDUSEV, Nuri. “Level of analysis and ‘unity of analysis’: a case for distinction”. Millennium,

v. 22, n. 1, p. 77-88. 1993. Disponível em: < https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/18/iranian-nuclear-deal-change- policy-us-ayatollah-ali-khameini>. Acesso em: 1 de Março de 2017.

Como Citar
Pinto, Vânia, Humberto Correa, e Fernanda Medeiros. 1. O Caso Prático Como Método De Ensino Em Teoria Das Relações Internacionais. Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies 18 (1). http://periodicos.unb.br/ojs311/index.php/MED/article/view/5304.
Seção
Dossiê