The image of kinaidos in Plato’s Gorgias

Keywords: Plato, Gorgias, kinaidos, hedonism, Greek homosexuality


In the final part of Plato’s Gorgias, Socrates uses an example in order to shame Callicles and thereby confront his hedonistic position. The term kinaidos can embarrass translators, interpreters and contemporary readers of the dialogue - some Brazilian editions use translations such as “devasso” and even “veado”. Socrates suggests that if we accept the identification between good and pleasure we should admit the life of the kinaidos as a happy one. But what exactly is the life of the kinaidos? Why cannot it be an example of a happy life? Although this image is abandoned quickly, this socratic argumentative device is decisive for the development of the discussion in the Gorgias. So until these questions are adequately answered, Socrates’ argument will remain partially unintelligible.

I start this article trying to demonstrate the importance of the kinaidos as the culminating example in an imagetic refutative process initiated by Socrates. Then I analyze the state of the question and demonstrate why studies of the level of importance of Charles Kahn, Kenneth Dover and John Winkler have not been able to cover all aspects of the meaning of this specific image in the Gorgias. Finally, I try to propose an interpretation according to which the mention of the kinaidos would be a Platonic response to a greek anti-intellectualist thesis, like the one present in Euripides’ Antiope. This response has a crucial role in Plato’s project to legitimize and specify philosophy against the practice of rhetoric.


Download data is not yet available.


BURNET, J. (ed.). (1944). Platonis opera, 5 vols. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DODDS, E. R. (1990). Plato - Gorgias. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
DOVER. K. J. (2007). A homossexualidade na Grécia Antiga (trad. Luís Sérgio Krausz). São Paulo, Editora Nova Alexandria.
COLLARD, C. CROPP, M. (ed.; trad.). (2008). Euripides 480-406 a. C: Fragments. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
FOX, M. (1998). The constrained man. In: Foxhall, L., SALMON, J. Thinking Men: Masculinity and its Self-Representation in the Classical Tradition. London and New York, Routledge.
GUTHRIE, W. K. C. (1975). A History of Greek Philosophy. (vol. IV) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HALPERIN, D. M. (2008). Platonic Eros and What Men Call Love. Ancient Philosophy 5 (2), p. 161-204.
HALPERIN, D. M. (1988). Forgetting Foucault: Acts, Identities, and the History of Sexuality, Representations, No. 63 (Summer, 1998), p. 93-120.
HALPERIN, D. M. (1986). Plato and Erotic Reciprocity. Classical Antiquity 5, p. 60-80.
HALPERIN, D. M.; WINKLER, J. J., ZEITLIN, F. I. (1990). Before sexuality: The construction of erotic experience in the ancient Greek world. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
IRWIN, T. (1995). Plato. Gorgias. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
KAHN, C. H. (1983). Drama and Dialetic in Plato’s Gorgias. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1, p. 75-121.
KLOSKO, G. (1984). The refutation of Callicles in Plato’s Gorgias. Greece and Rome (Second Series), 31.02 (1984), p. 126-139.
LEVY, D. (2014). Socrates vs. Callicles: Examination & Ridicule in Plato’s Gorgias. PLATO JOURNAL: The Journal of the International Plato Society 13, p. 27-36.
LOPES, D. R. N. (2011). Górgias de Platão. Tradução, ensaio introdutório e notas. São Paulo, Perspectiva.
MCKIM, R. (1988). Shame and Truth in Plato’s Gorgias. In: Griswold, C. Platonic Writings / Platonic Readings. New York, Routledge.
MOSS, J. (2005). Shame, Pleasure and the Divided Soul. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford, Carendon.
NIGHTINGALE, A. (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. New York, Cambridge University Press.
PARRY, R. D. (2014). Psychological Dimensions of Elenchus in the Gorgias. Archai, n. 14, Jan - Jun, p. 65-76.
PINHEIRO, A. E. (trad.; notas). (2009). Xenofonte, Memoráveis. São Paulo, Annablume Clássica.
SNELL, B. (1964). Vita Activa and Vita Contemplativa in Euripides’ Antiope. Scenes from Greek Drama, p. 70-98.
TARRANT, H. (2008). The Dramatic Background of the Arguments with Callicles, Euripides’ Antiope, and an Athenian Anti-Intellectual Argument. Antichthon 42, p. 20-39.
WINKLER, J. (1990). The Constraints of Desire. The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York & London, Routledge.
How to Cite
FreitasL. E. (2018). The image of kinaidos in Plato’s Gorgias. Archai: The Origins of Western Thought, (23), 77.