Some Considerations about the Relationship between Science and Philosophy in Ptolemaic Writings

An Analysis from Its Teleological Model of Explanation

Keywords: Science, Theology, Scientific Rationality, Metaphysics, Ptolemy

Abstract

There is abundant bibliography today that has been concerned with presenting the astronomer as an empiricist scientist focused on the task of saving appearances and disconnected from all kinds of theological or metaphysical reflection. In opposition to this line of reading, we will limit ourselves to study in his Almagest and in his Harmonics the scientific-mythological unit that crosses both its normative image of science and its own scientific practice. This unity, in our view, allows us to understand Ptolemy’s notion of science from more comprehensive coordinates than empiricism offers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Teresa Gargiulo, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

CONICET

References

BARKER, A. (trad.) (1989). Ptolemy. “Harmonics”. In: Greek Musical Writings II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BARKER, A. (2000). Scientific Method in Ptolemy’s Harmonics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BEAUJEU, J. (1966). La ciencia helenística y romana. In: TATON, R. (ed.). Historia General de las Ciencias. Vol. I. Barcelona, Orbis. p. 333-461.
BOLL, F. (1894). Studien uber Claudius Ptolemaus. Jahrbucher fur classische. Philologie 21 (Suppl.), p. 218-235.
BOWEN, A. (1994). Review of Ptolemy’s Universe. The Natural Philosophical and Ethical Foundations of Ptolemy’s Astronomy, by Liba Taub. Isis 85, n. 1, p. 141.
DIJKSTERHUIS, E. J. (1961). The Mechanization of the World. Translated by C. Dikshoorn. New York, Oxford University Press.
DREYER, J. L. (1906). History of the planetary systems from Thales to Kepler. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
DUHEM, P. (1969). To Save the Phenomena. An Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo. Trans. E. Doland and C. Maschler. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
ECHANDÍA, G. R. (trad.) (1995). Aristóteles. Física. Madrid, Gredos.
EGGERS LAN, C. (trad.) (1988). Platón. República. Diálogos IV. Madrid, Gredos.
FEKE, J. (2009). Ptolemy in Philosophical Context. A Study of the Relationships between Physics, Mathematics, and Theology. PhD thesis in Philosophy. Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and technology of the University of Toronto.
HANSON, N. R. (1985). Constelaciones y Conjeturas. Madrid, Alianza.
HASKINS, C. H. (1960). Studies in the History of Medieval Science. New York/Cambridge, F. Ungar.
HEIBERG, J. L (ed.). (1898). Ptolemy. Syntaxis Mathematica. Vol. 1. Leipzig, Teubner.
HEIBERG, J. L (ed.). (1903). Ptolemy. Syntaxis Mathematica. Vol. 2. Leipzig, Teubner.
KUNITZSCH, P. (1974). Der Almagest, Die Syntaxis Mathematica des Claudius Ptolemäus in arabisch-lateinischer Überlieferung. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz.
LEJEUNE, A. (ed.) (1956). L’Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d’après l’arabe de l’émir Eugène de Sicile. Louvain, Université de Louvain. (Recueil de travaux d’histoire et de philologie, 4e série, fasc. 8.)
LLOYD, G. E. R. (1963). Who is attacked in On Ancient Medicine? Phronesis 8, p. 121-126.
LLOYD, G. E. R. (1973). De Tales a Aristóteles. Buenos Aires, EUDEBA.
LLOYD, G. E. R. (1978). Saving the Appearances. The Classical Quarterly New Series 28, n. 1, p. 202-222.
LONG, A. (1988). Ptolemy On the Criterion. An epistemology for the practicing scientist. In: DILLON, J. M.; LONG, A.A. (eds.). The Question of Eclecticism. Studies in later Greek Philosophy, Berkeley, University of California Press, p. 176-207.
MANULI, P. (1980). Claudio Tolomeo: il criterio e il principe. Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 36, n. 1, p. 64-88.
MARTÍNEZ, C. (trad.) (1998). Aristóteles. Metafísica. Madrid, Gredos.
MÍNGUEZ, C. (1995). El Prefacio al Almagesto de Ptolomeo. Thémata 14, p. 17-35.
MITTELSTRASS, J. (1962). Die Rettung der Phänomene. Berlin, W. de Gruyter.
NEUGEBAUER, O. (1975). A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. 3 vols. Berlin, Springer.
PEDERSEN, O. (2011). A survey of the Almagest. With Annotation and New Commentary by Alexander Jones. New York, Springer.
PÉREZ SEDEÑO, E. (1987). Introducción a Ptolomeo. In: Las hipótesis de los planetas. Madrid, Alianza.
SAMBURSKY, S. (1970). El mundo físico a fines de la antigüedad. Buenos Aires, Eudeba.
SWERDLOW, N. M. (2004). Ptolemy’s Harmonics and the ‘Tones of the Universe’ in the Canobic Inscription. In: BURNETT, C.; HOGENDIJK, J. P.; PLOFKER, K.; YANO, M. (eds.). Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree. Leiden, Brill, p. 137-180.
TAUB, L. C. (1993). Ptolemy’s Universe. The Natural Philosophical and Etical Foundations of Ptolemy’s Universe. Chicago, Open Court Pub.
TOULMIN, S.; GOODFIELD, J. (1961). La trama de los cielos. Buenos Aires, Eudeba.
TOOMER, G. J. (trans.) (1998). Ptolemy’s Almagest. New York, Springer-Verlag.
WASSERSTEIN, A. (1962). Greek Scientific Thought. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 188, n. 8, p. 51-63.
Published
2018-12-18
How to Cite
Gargiulo, M. T. (2018). Some Considerations about the Relationship between Science and Philosophy in Ptolemaic Writings. Archai: The Origins of Western Thought, (25), e02506. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X-25-6