There is, evidently, a “Parmenides physikos”, but…

About Livio Rossetti, Un altro Parmenide, 2017

Keywords: Parmenides, doxa, Rossetti, phusikos

Abstract

As all the pre-Socratic, Parmenides became interested in the study of the phusis, and consider he as a philosopher phusikos is natural. L. Rossetti, in his cappolavoro in two volumes Un altro Parmenide (Diogene Multimedia, Bologne, 2017), studied exhaustively the question. However, the perspective from which Rossetti faces the problem, not solve two major obstacles: the place of the “physical” texts in the so- called “doxa of mortals”, and the negative character that it has to Parmenides. Dependent on the arbitrary division of the poem in two sections, proposed in 1795 by G.G. Fülleborn, “physical” texts of Parmenides would thus correspond to a “deceiver speech of words” , which begins in verse 8.51 and ends in the Br. 19, speech that would diminish the positive character that physics has for Parmenides. The only way to claim the existence of a “Parmenides phusikos” consists of take off the fragments “physical” of those in which the goddess exposes “the opinions of mortals”, which criticizes. Obviously, this hypothesis implies a critical review of the doxographical tradition, that begins with Aristotle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARNES, J. (1979). Parmenides and the Eleatic One. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61, p. 1-21.
CALENDA, G. (2011). Epistemologia greca del VI e V secolo a.C. Eraclito e gli Eleati. Roma, Aracne.
CASERTANO, G. (1989). Parmenide. Il metodo, la scienza, l’esperienza. Napoli, Loffredo.
CORDERO, N.-L. (2017). La place de la ‘physique’ de Parménide dans une nouvelle reconstitution du Poème. Revue de philosophieancienne 35, n. 1, p. 3-13.
FÜLLEBORN, G. G. (1795). Fragmente des Parmenides. Neu gesammelt, übersetz und erläutert. In: Beyträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie. Vol. 5. Züllichau/Freistadt: Frommannische Buchhandlung, p. 1-102.
GAMBETTI, F. (2011). Parmenide, filosofo della natura. Dottorato di ricerca infilosofia e teoria delle scienze umane. Roma, Università degli Studi Roma Tre.
GIGANTE, M. (1988). ΦΥΣΙΚΟΣ.La Parola del Passato43, p. 224.
HERSCHBELL, J. R. (1970).Parmenides’ Way of Truth and B 16. Apeiron 4, n. 2, p. 1-23.
ISNARDI PARENTI, M. (1988). Il Parmenide di Plutarco. La Parola del Passato 43, p. 225-236.
KIRK, G. S.; RAVEN, J. E.; SCHOFIELD, M. (1987). The Presocratic Philosophers. A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2. ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LAFRANCE, Y. (1981). La théorie platonicienne de la doxa. Montréal/Paris, Bellarmin/Les Belles Lettres.
LICCIARDI, I. A. (2016). Parmenide tràdito. Parmenide tradìto nel Commentario di Simplicio alla Fisica di Aristotele. Sankt Augustin, Akademia.
LICCIARDI, I. A. (2017). Critica dell’apparente e critica apparente. Simplicio interprete di Parmenide nel Commentario al De Caelo di Aristotele. SankAugustin, Akademia.
LOENEN, J. H. M. M. (1959). Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. Assen, Royal Van Gorcum.
MASULLO, M. (2013). Da Elea a Baghdad e ritorno: la figura di Parmenide medico nel Medioevo arabo ed europeo. La Mandragola. 10 Settembre 2013. (Disponível em https://web.archive.org/web/ 20160615040937/http://www.lamandragola.org/?p=534.)
POPPER, K. (1999). Elmundo de Parménides. Ensayos sobre la ilustración presocrática. Trad. Carlos Solís. Barcelona, Paidós.
ROSSETTI, L. (2017). Un altro Parmenide. 2 vols. Bologna, Diogenes Multimedia.
SANTORO, F. (2011). Filósofos épicos I: Xenófanes e Parmênides. Rio de Janeiro, Hexis.
Published
2018-12-10
How to Cite
Cordero, N.-L. (2018). There is, evidently, a “Parmenides physikos”, but…. Archai: The Origins of Western Thought, (25), e02507. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X-25-7